How Does an Infinitely High Potential Wall Impact Quantum Wave Functions?

  • Context: Archived 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stefan10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Schrödinger equation for a quantum system with a step potential of height \( V_0 \) and an infinitely high wall at \( x = a \). The wave functions are defined as \( \psi_1(x) = A e^{ik_1x} + B e^{-ik_1x} \) for \( x < 0 \) and \( \psi_2(x) = C \sin[k_2(x-a)] + D \cos[k_2(x-a)] \) for \( 0 \leq x \leq a \). Boundary conditions lead to a complex relationship between the constants \( A, B, C, \) and \( D \), ultimately simplifying to \( D = 0 \) due to the infinite potential at \( x = a \). The final expressions for \( B \) and \( C \) are derived using Cramer's rule, confirming that the particle is always reflected at the infinite potential barrier.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the T-Independent Schrödinger Equation
  • Familiarity with wave functions and boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Cramer's rule for solving linear equations
  • Concept of potential barriers in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of infinite potential barriers on wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for solving the Schrödinger equation in different potential scenarios
  • Explore the concept of reflection and transmission coefficients in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of wave functions at finite potential barriers and compare with infinite barriers
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions, potential barriers, and the Schrödinger equation. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of quantum reflection phenomena.

stefan10
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider reflection from a step potential of height v-knot with E> v-knot, but now with an infinitely high wall added at a distance a from the step.

infinity < x < 0 => v(x) = 0
0≤ x≤ a => v = vknot
x=a => v= infinity

Solve the Schroedinger equation to find ψ(x) for x< 0 and 0 ≤ x ≤ a, solution should contain only one unknown constant.

Homework Equations



T-Independent Schrödinger EQ

General forms of a wave function.

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it correct to first assume that all constants are physically possible in both equations? You'll have a reflection and transmission at the first finite barrier, and a reflection (always) at the infinite barrier. That means there are four constants in both equations. If not, can you explain why?

I should have

ψ_1 = A1 cos (k1*x) + B1 sin(k1*x) (or the respective complex exponentials)
ψ_2= A2 cos(k2*x) + B2 sin(k2*x) (this is for the region 0≤x≤a

When I look at the three boundary conditions,

1. ψ_1(0_ = ψ_2(0)

2. dψ_1/dx (0) = dψ_2/dx (0)

3. ψ_2(a) = 0

I get a complicated algebraic relation between the constants that does not simplify.

So I assume I must get rid of one of the constants, but I'm unsure which one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solving the SE equation in the two regions, we get
\begin{align*}
\psi_1(x) &= Ae^{ik_1x}+B^{-ik_1x} \\
\psi_2(x) &= C\sin[k_2(x-a)] + D\cos[k_2(x-a)]
\end{align*} where ##k_1^2 = \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}## and ##k_2^2=\frac{2m(E-V_0)}{\hbar^2}##.

From ##\psi(a)=0##, it follows that ##D=0##. (Writing ##\psi_2## in terms of ##x-a## instead of just ##x## simplifies the algebra.) Continuity of the wave function and its derivative at ##x=0## yields
\begin{align*}
A + B &= -C \sin k_2 a \\
ik_1 A - ik_1 B &= C k_2 \cos k_2 a.
\end{align*} Since ##e^{ik_1x}## represents the incident wave, let's choose to solve for the other two constants in terms of ##A##. Applying Cramer's rule to the system
\begin{align*}
B + C \sin k_2 a &= -A \\
B + C \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a &= A,
\end{align*}we get
$$B = \frac
{\begin{vmatrix} -A & \sin k_2 a \\ A & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & \sin k_2 a \\ 1 & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
= A \frac{ \sin k_2 a - i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a}{\sin k_2 a + i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a} \\
C = \frac
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & -A \\ 1 & A \end{vmatrix}}
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & \sin k_2 a \\ 1 & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
= -A \frac{2}{\sin k_2 a + i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a}.$$
After doing a problem like this, it's good to sanity-check your answers. For example, you can show that ##\lvert B/A \rvert^2 = 1##, which indicates that particle is always reflected, as you'd expect because of the infinite potential. A good idea would also be to check what happens when ##V_0=0##. There should be no reflection at ##x=0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K