How Does Changing Pipe Radius Affect Pressure in Laminar Flow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ussrasu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipe Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Poiseuille's Law to determine the impact of changing pipe radius on pressure difference in laminar flow. Specifically, it addresses how reducing the pipe radius by 20% necessitates a significant increase in pressure difference to maintain the same flow rate. The viscosity of water is noted as 1.0 x 10^-3 Pa.s, and the Reynolds number is introduced as a critical factor for assessing whether flow remains laminar, with a threshold of 3500. The participants emphasize using ratios to simplify calculations and validate assumptions about flow conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poiseuille's Law and its equation: J = ((pi*R^4)/(8*eta))*((delta(P))/l)
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts, particularly laminar flow and viscosity
  • Ability to calculate Reynolds number to determine flow regime
  • Basic algebra skills for rearranging equations and solving for unknowns
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the percentage increase in pressure difference required when the pipe radius is reduced by 20% using Poiseuille's Law.
  • Learn how to calculate the Reynolds number for various flow conditions to assess laminar versus turbulent flow.
  • Explore the implications of viscosity on flow rates in different pipe diameters and materials.
  • Investigate practical applications of Poiseuille's Law in engineering, particularly in fluid transport systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, engineers involved in pipeline design, and anyone interested in optimizing fluid flow in systems such as irrigation or industrial processes.

ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I need some help with this question.

Q: Poiseuille's equation shows that for laminar flow the volume flow rate through a pipe in proportional to the product of the pressure difference and the fourth power of the radius. The viscosity of water is 1.0*10^-3 Pa.s

a) Water in a pipe is flowing without turbulence under a certain pressure difference. If the radius of the pipe is reduced by 20%, what percentage increase in pressure difference is required to maintain the same flow rate?

b) In agricultural irrigation, typical values of flow velocity and pipe diameter are 1.0m/s and 100mm, respectively. Is a calculation such as in part a) applicable? (i.e. is the flow in the pipe likely to be laminar?)

I don't know how to do part a) - I am guessing it involves rearranging Poiseuille's Law - but i don't know how to do the maths for it?

The Law is: J = ((pi*R^4)/(8*eta))*((delta(P))/l)

Thanks in advance! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ussrasu said:
I don't know how to do part a) - I am guessing it involves rearranging Poiseuille's Law - but i don't know how to do the maths for it?

The Law is: J = ((pi*R^4)/(8*eta))*((delta(P))/l)
Sounds to me like you are supposed to assume all else stays the same except radius and pressure. Write your J equation for two different combinations of radius and pressure difference and set the equations equal. You can solve for the ratio of pressure differences in terms of the known ratio of radii.
 
So i let R = 0.8 on one side, and the final pressure as what I am trying to find, and then on the other side i let R=1 as that's at the initial radius, and let the pressure equal 1 here asell and then solve for Final Pressure?

Thanks!
 
ussrasu said:
So i let R = 0.8 on one side, and the final pressure as what I am trying to find, and then on the other side i let R=1 as that's at the initial radius, and let the pressure equal 1 here asell and then solve for Final Pressure?

Thanks!
That's the idea, but you don't have to use 1 for anything. You can use ratios. For one case you have R1 and deltaP1; for the second case you have R2 and deltaP2. When you set the two equal you can rearrange the equation to solve for the ratio deltaP2/deltaP1 in terms of the known ratio R2/R1.
 
Cool thanks!
 
Does anyone have any ideas on how to explain part b to this question? What would you say?

Thanks
 
Calculate the Reynolds number for that flow. If it is <3500 or so, it will be laminar.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K