How does closure equality imply subset in Willard theorem 3.7?

5 replies · 2K views · last reply
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to understand Willard Theorem 3.7 concerning topological closure ...
I am reading Stephen Willard: General Topology ... ... and am currently reading Chapter 2: Topological Spaces and am currently focused on Section 1: Fundamental Concepts ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand an aspect of the proof of Theorem 3.7 ... ..Theorem 3.7 and its proof read as follows:
Printed textbook page from Willard's General Topology showing Definition 3.5 (closure), Lemma 3.6, Theorem 3.7 with properties K-a to K-e, and the start of its proof.

Printed textbook page with math: proof that F1 union ... union Fn lies in the collection F, with overline closure equalities, followed by a text explaining Kuratowski closure operations and the K-a to K-d axioms.

In the above proof by Willard we read the following:

" ... ... First note that if ##A \subset B##, then by K-c, ##\overline{B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{ (B -A) }## so that ##\overline{A} \subset \overline{B}## ... ... "Can someone please demonstrate, formally and rigorously, how ##\overline{B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{ (B -A) }## implies that ##\overline{A} \subset \overline{B}## ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Wow ... that was quick ...

Yes that's right ... hmm is it as simple as that ...

Thanks ...

Peter
 
Hi. Something went wrong with wrong with the formatting. I think it follows from ##X\subseteq X\cup Y## for sets ##X,Y##.

(I deleted previous post, but it was correct).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks ...

I think I have corrected the formatting ...

I think you're correct ...

Thanks again ...

Peter
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159
Math_QED said:
Hi. Something went wrong with wrong with the formatting. I think it follows from ##X\subseteq X\cup Y## for sets ##X,Y##.

(I deleted previous post, but it was correct).
I am probably being pedantic ... but it might be more accurate to say that ...

##\overline{B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{ (B -A) }## implies that ##\overline{A} \subset \overline{B}## ... ... is true because ...

... for sets ##X, Y## and ##Z## we have that ...

##X = Y \cup Z \Longrightarrow Y \subset X##... ...

Peter
 
I would just write it like this:

##\overline{A}\subseteq \overline{A} \cup \overline{B - A} = \overline{B}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur