MHB How Does Constant Acceleration Affect Antelope Speed Over 70 Meters?

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
An antelope moving with constant acceleration covers the
distance between two points $\textbf{70.0m}$ apart in $\textbf{7.00s}$
Its speed as it passes the second point is $\textbf{15.00 m/s}$.
What is its speed at the first point?

The answer to this is 5 m/s

ok this should be real simple but kinda ?

$\displaystyle
\frac{70m}{7s}=\frac{10m}{s}$
so
$\displaystyle\frac{15-5}{2}=10\\
x=5$.

b. What is its acceleration

$\begin{align*}\displaystyle
a&=\frac{v_2-v_1}{t_2-t_1}\\
&=\frac{15-x}{7}\\
&\approx 1.43 m/s
\end{align*}$

kinda got it

suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kinematics equation for constant acceleration ...

$\Delta x = \bar{v} \cdot t$

$\Delta x = \dfrac{v_0+v_f}{2} \cdot t$

solve for $v_0$, then $a = \dfrac{\Delta v}{t}$
 
ok, I don't think I know what that would look with numbers given?
 
karush said:
ok, I don't think I know what that would look with numbers given?

Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that statement ... physics problems are solved using variables, then values are substituted as the last step.

$\Delta x = \dfrac{v_0+v_f}{2} \cdot t \implies v_0 = \dfrac{2\Delta x}{t} - v_f$

now substitute in your given values ... $v_f = 15 \, m/s$, $t = 7 \, s$, and $\Delta x = 70 \, m$

$v_0 = \dfrac{2 \cdot 70 \, m}{7 \, s} - 15 \, m/s = 5 \, m/s$

finally ...

$a = \dfrac{\Delta v}{t} = \dfrac{v_f-v_0}{t} = \dfrac{15 \, m/s - 5 \, m/s}{7 \, s} = \dfrac{10}{7} \, m/s^2$
 
A slightly different way of looking at it. With constant acceleration a, initial speed [math]v_0[/math], initial position [math]x_0[/math], [math]v(t)= at+ v_0[/math] and [math]x(t)= x_0+ v_0t+ (a/2)t^2[/math].

Taking the first point to be [math]x_0= 0[/math], [math]x(7)= 7v_0+ (49/2)a= 70[/math] and [math]v(7)= 7a+ v_0= 15[/math]. Since we only want to determine [math]v_0[/math], multiply the second equation by 7/2 to get the same coefficient of a, (49/2)a+ (7/2)v_0= 105/2, and subtract from the first equation: [math](7- 7/2)v_0= (7/2)v_0= 70- 105/2= 35/2[/math] so [math]v_0= 35/7= 5[/math] m/s.

Put [math]v_0= 5[/math] into either of those equations and solve for a: The simpler is [math]7(5)+ v_0= 35+ v_0= 15[/math] so [math]v_0= 15- 35= -25 m/s^2[/math]. This is negative indicating that the antelope was slowing down.
 
Plot velocity versus time.
The Area under the curve is the distance traveled for a given time interval.

View attachment 7670

Using the formula for volume of a trapezoid...

A =h (a+b)/2

Where:
a=v
b=15 m/s
h=7 s
A=70 m

then

70=7(v+15)/2
140/7=v+15
v=20-15=5
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    14.5 KB · Views: 131
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top