How Does Cutting a Spring in Half Affect Its Oscillation Period?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of cutting an ideal spring in half on its oscillation period in a simple harmonic oscillator setup. The relevant equation for the period T of a mass-spring system is T = 2π√(m/k), where m is the mass attached to the spring and k is the spring constant. When the spring is cut in half, the spring constant k effectively doubles, resulting in a new period of T/√2. Participants explored the implications of this change, emphasizing the relationship between spring length and spring constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion
  • Familiarity with the spring constant (k) and its relationship to spring length
  • Knowledge of the formula for the period of a mass-spring system (T = 2π√(m/k))
  • Basic concepts of forces and motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the spring constant for different spring configurations
  • Study the effects of mass changes on the oscillation period of a mass-spring system
  • Explore the differences between simple harmonic motion and other types of oscillatory motion
  • Learn about the implications of cutting springs in real-world applications, such as in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators looking for illustrative examples of harmonic oscillators.

mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A simple harmonic oscillator consists of a mass m and an ideal spring with spring constant k. Particle oscillates as shown in (i) with period T. If the spring is cut in half and used with the same particle, as shown in (ii), the period will be :
(choose one of the following)
T
\sqrt{2}T
2T
T/\sqrt{2}
T/2


Homework Equations



k=m\omega^2
??

The Attempt at a Solution



I blush, but I admit it: guess and check (there were five choices, and we have 5 chances to submit each problem...):redface:

I figure since this is an ideal spring, it has no mass, so the only equation I can think of is rather useless...
Any pointers on the right way to figure this baby out?
 

Attachments

  • snipped springs.GIF
    snipped springs.GIF
    2.1 KB · Views: 642
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the expression for the time-period of an ideal mass-spring system? (You must know this equation :-p it's a manipulation of the formula you quoted). In addition, I should point out that the m in your expression is not the mass of the spring itself, rather the mass hanging from the spring.
 
Last edited:
oh ghod... excuse me while I bury myself in a hole.
Cramming is evil. It fries brain cells at a time when every brain cell counts.
 
mbrmbrg said:
oh ghod... excuse me while I bury myself in a hole.
Cramming is evil. It fries brain cells at a time when every brain cell counts.

I'm trying to figure out why the question asked by Hootenanny elicited this response from you. What does happen when you cut the spring in half?
 
OlderDan said:
I'm trying to figure out why the question asked by Hootenanny elicited this response from you. What does happen when you cut the spring in half?
Because I thought I could sove it. But I couldn't.
I don't know what happens when you cut a spring in half. However, an educated guess I can make.
A smaller spring will have a smaller amplitude (and so by default a smaller k). Does the amplitude change by the same amount that the spring was cut (ie spring cut in half==>x_m cut in half)?
I would think not, because with that assumption I got:

T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}

so if omega=omaga/2, then

T_{new}= \frac{4\pi}{omega}=2T=WRONG
 
mbrmbrg said:
A smaller spring will have a smaller amplitude (and so by default a smaller k).
Are you sure about that? :wink: And the equation I was referring to above is ;

T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}
 
Last edited:
mbrmbrg said:
Because I thought I could sove it. But I couldn't.
I don't know what happens when you cut a spring in half. However, an educated guess I can make.
A smaller spring will have a smaller amplitude (and so by default a smaller k). Does the amplitude change by the same amount that the spring was cut (ie spring cut in half==>x_m cut in half)?
I would think not, because with that assumption I got:

T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}

so if omega=omaga/2, then

T_{new}= \frac{4\pi}{omega}=2T=WRONG

Here is a hint then: How far does the middle of the spring move when the end originally attached to the mass moves a distance x?
 
OlderDan said:
Here is a hint then: How far does the middle of the spring move when the end originally attached to the mass moves a distance x?

It can't be x, because the spring isn't rigid. I mean, the end attatched to a ceiling or wall or whatever doesn't move at all! So the end attatched to the mass moves x, and as you move farther and farther from the mass, the spring moves less and less. But I don't know how to quantify it.
 
Here's another hint: Say you stretch a spring by an amount X. This takes a certain amount of force. Now cut the spring in half. Will it take more or less force to stretch that half spring by the same distance X?
 
  • #10
OlderDan said:
Here is a hint then: How far does the middle of the spring move when the end originally attached to the mass moves a distance x?

What Dan was getting at:
since you can consider a spring made up of two smaller springs attached end to end, and since the first spring will pull on the second with the same tension (same as the overall pull), then compare the distance moved by the spring attached to the wall to the overall distance moved by the two springs in combination (it's half the distance isn't it?). Since the same force will extend each spring half the distance (x/2) of the total extension (x), what then is the spring constant (the F over x ratio) for one of the springs (if "k" is the constant for the two in combination)?

Edit:

Sorry OlderDan, I stepped on yr toes
 
  • #11
I'm going to meet with my physics professor now, so hopefully he'll explain it. If not... I'l be ba-aack. :evilgrin:
 
  • #12
One you find the answer, realize that a simple pendulum has a different equation and a different result when you cut the length in half
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
986
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K