How Does Earth's Radius Influence Calculations in Magnetic Field Equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of Earth's radius on calculations related to its magnetic field, particularly in the context of magnetic dipole equations. The original poster is uncertain about the application of the Biot-Savart Law and seeks guidance on the relevant formulas for calculating the magnetic field at a specified distance above the North Pole.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate formulas for calculating the magnetic field around a magnetic dipole, with some suggesting the use of specific equations and others questioning the treatment of Earth's radius in relation to distance from the magnetic dipole.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the formulas to use, while others are exploring the implications of treating Earth's radius and the distance from the surface as a unified distance. There is an ongoing investigation into the assumptions underlying these calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of exploration into the concepts discussed. There is a noted discrepancy between calculated values and expected results, prompting further inquiry into the assumptions made in the equations used.

Melqarthos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole. If the field near the North Pole is about , what will it be (approximately) 1.4×104 above the surface at the North Pole?

Homework Equations



Apparently we need to use the Biot-Savart Law which I'm not sure how it even applies in this situation granted that Earth's magnetic field acts like a dipole.

The Attempt at a Solution



If anyone could give me a heads up on how to do this, that'd be great.

Melqarthos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not the Biot-Savart Law. You just need the formula for the magnetic field around a magnetic dipole. Look it up in Wikipedia if your textbook doesn't have it handy.
 
Well from what I understand we know that μ=NIA, which is the magnetic dipole moment of a coil and is considered a vector. I also know that:

torque= μ*B

This is all useful only when we're messing with currents. We can further our investigation by realizing that we can use μ and sub it into the equation of a magnetic field produced by a magnetic dipole (along the dipole axis):

B= [μ(permeability constant)/2pi]*[ μ/(R^2+x^2)^(3/2)]

Oh I see! Let me try to figure this one out.
 
Delphi51 said:
Not the Biot-Savart Law. You just need the formula for the magnetic field around a magnetic dipole. Look it up in Wikipedia if your textbook doesn't have it handy.

I tried the problem again. Check the picture to see my work. I used another value for distance from the North pole. Instead of a distance of 1.4*10^4 I used 1.3*10^4 km. The back of my book says the answer should be 3.6*10^-6 T, but that's not what I got.

Meqlarthos
 

Attachments

  • Physics.png
    Physics.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 650
Delphi51 said:
Not the Biot-Savart Law. You just need the formula for the magnetic field around a magnetic dipole. Look it up in Wikipedia if your textbook doesn't have it handy.

Okay I got it! But there's something I don't get. Why do we treat the radius of the Earth and the distance away from the magnetic dipole as 'one unified' distance, rather than two distances where the distance away from the Earth's surface should be x^2 as according to the magnetic dipole equation:

B= (μ0*μ)/(2*pi*(R^2+x^2)^(3/2)

and generally if x>>R, then:

B=(μ0*μ)/(2*pi*x^3)

I hope you can see where I'm coming from when I say why treat the Earth's radius and the distance away from the Earth's surface as one unified distance when the equations that give us the magnetic field don't tell us to do this.

Melqarthos
 

Attachments

  • New Physics.png
    New Physics.png
    20.8 KB · Views: 652

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K