How Does Gauss' Law Apply to a Non-Uniformly Charged Hollow Sphere?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves applying Gauss' Law to determine the electric field generated by a hollow spherical shell with a non-uniform charge density defined as \(\rho=k/r^2\) within specified regions. The regions of interest are inside the shell, within the shell, and outside the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the enclosed charge \(Q_{\text{enc}}\) for the region between the radii \(a\) and \(b\) but expresses confusion regarding the limits of integration. Some participants question the choice of limits and the implications of the Gaussian surface's position.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the setup and exploring the implications of the charge density and Gaussian surface. There is a moment of realization from one participant regarding the misunderstanding of the Gaussian surface's extension.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a potential misunderstanding of how to apply Gauss' Law in the context of non-uniform charge distributions and the implications of symmetry in determining the electric field.

hatsoff
Messages
16
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A hollow spherical shell carries charge density \rho=k/r^2 in the region a\leq r\leq b. Use Gauss' Law in integral form to find the electric field in three regions: (i) r<a, (ii) a<r<b, (iii) r>b.

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law in integral form: \oint_{\text{surface}}\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{a}=\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}Q_{\text{enc}}

where Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau is the total charge enclosed within the surface.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm looking at (ii) to start. Due to symmetry we have \textbf{E}=|\textbf{E}|\hat r and so we can pull this out of the left term of the integral in Gauss' law. But I'm confused on how to compute Qenc. I would expect to take the radius part of the integral from a to b, this way:

Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau= \int_{\text{surface}}\int_a^b \rho\;dr\;d\textbf{a}

However the solutions manual suggests that I should leave r as a variable and take the integral from a to r, this way:

Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau= \int_{\text{surface}}\int_a^r \rho\;d\bar r\;d\textbf{a}

I don't understand this. Why do we get to ignore the field between r and b?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well part ii) is asking for the electric field between a and b. So where will the Gaussian surface extend to?
 
BruceW said:
well part ii) is asking for the electric field between a and b. So where will the Gaussian surface extend to?

OH, I see now!

That was silly.

Thanks.
 
haha, no worries!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
978
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K