How does gravitational self-interaction affect the Milky Way Galaxy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KurtLudwig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Stars
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of gravitational self-interaction on the Milky Way Galaxy, specifically regarding its shape and star rotation curves. The Einstein Field Equation's nonlinearity suggests that gravity interacts with itself; however, current consensus indicates that such effects are negligible, necessitating the postulation of dark matter to explain galaxy rotation. Research by physicist Alexander Deur challenges this viewpoint, although it has not gained widespread acceptance in the scientific community. The MOND theory also proposes that General Relativity may not accurately describe gravity at low accelerations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Einstein Field Equation
  • Familiarity with General Relativity (GR)
  • Knowledge of dark matter and its implications in astrophysics
  • Basic concepts of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Einstein Field Equation in astrophysics
  • Study the concept of dark matter and its role in galaxy rotation curves
  • Explore Alexander Deur's research and its critiques within the physics community
  • Investigate the principles and applications of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in gravitational theories, galaxy dynamics, and the ongoing debates surrounding dark matter and alternative gravitational models.

KurtLudwig
Messages
146
Reaction score
31
It is believed that gravity interacts with itself. I assume that gravity between stars increases. Does gravitational self-interaction change the galaxy's shape or increase the rotation curves of stars?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
KurtLudwig said:
It is believed that gravity interacts with itself.
More precisely, the Einstein Field Equation is nonlinear, which can be described as gravity interacting with itself. There is a lot of complexity lurking here; see this Insights article series for more information:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/does-gravity-gravitate/

KurtLudwig said:
I assume that gravity between stars increases.
No, gravity interacting with itself is not that simple.

KurtLudwig said:
Does gravitational self-interaction change the galaxy's shape or increase the rotation curves of stars?
The standard viewpoint at present is that any such effect is negligible, because gravity is too weak in this regime for any nonlinear effects to be significant. This is one of the chief reasons why the standard viewpoint postulates dark matter in order to account for galaxy rotation curves.

There is a body of research by Deur, among others, that claims that the above is not the case. This research has been discussed in a number of PF threads. I think it's fair to say that these proposals have not achieved much traction in the wider community, although research along these lines continues.

There is also the MOND viewpoint, which claims, in effect, that GR does not correctly describe the law of gravity for very small "acceleration due to gravity". (Many MOND proponents do not describe their research this way, but that is what it amounts to.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KurtLudwig, vanhees71, fresh_42 and 2 others
Thank you so much for taking the tine to answer my questions.
I attempted to understand your insights article "does-gravity-gravitate", however I am not at your level. One actually has to study physics at a graduate level and take classes in General Relativity to understand.
Is professor Alexander Deur mathematics correct? As you know, he is a reasearch physicist in particle physics at Jefferson Labs in Virginia.
 
KurtLudwig said:
Is professor Alexander Deur mathematics correct?
That is an open question. If you search PF for his name you will find multiple threads discussing his work. I am not aware of any other physicist who has confirmed his calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
9K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
833
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K