How Does Invariance Apply in Relativity Theory?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of invariance in relativity theory, specifically focusing on the relationship between angular frequency and wave vector in different reference frames. Participants are exploring the mathematical expressions related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive expressions for angular frequency and wave vector under Lorentz transformations. There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the events and the observers' frames of reference. Some participants express confusion about the mathematical treatment of dot products and vector relationships.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants questioning the assumptions made in the problem setup. Hints have been provided to focus on the mathematical aspects rather than the physical interpretations. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention a lack of proficiency in vector algebra, which is noted as a potential barrier to understanding the problem. There is an emphasis on the need for a solid mathematical foundation to tackle the concepts in relativity.

timetraveller123
Messages
620
Reaction score
45

Homework Statement


upload_2017-11-17_11-55-37.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


ok so for w' i am getting since the s' is only moving in x direction
##
\omega' = \omega \gamma (1 + \beta)
##
is this correct then i am having some trouble in dealing with the dot product to derive for
##
\bf {ck'}
##
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-17_11-55-37.png
    upload_2017-11-17_11-55-37.png
    19.5 KB · Views: 1,286
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not generally correct. Please show your work.
 
Orodruin said:
It is not generally correct. Please show your work.
i am not getting what you mean
this is what i did
##
\omega = 2 \pi f\\
\omega' = 2 \pi f'
##
say an event occurs infront of moving observer then
##
f' = f \gamma (1+ \beta)
##
 
vishnu 73 said:
say an event occurs infront of moving observer
You cannot make this assumption.
 
oh are you saying the event can occur above or below the x axis
 
ok then letting the event be anywhere on the xy plane then
let v be the relative velocity between s' and s
and ##\theta## be angle formed in s and ##\theta'## the angle formed in s'
f be the frequency in s and f' be the frequency in s'
upload_2017-11-17_16-20-45.png

then
##
f = f_0\\
f' = f_0 \frac{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{1 - \beta cos \theta'}

##
is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-17_15-59-16.png
    upload_2017-11-17_15-59-16.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 463
  • upload_2017-11-17_15-59-26.png
    upload_2017-11-17_15-59-26.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 450
  • upload_2017-11-17_16-20-45.png
    upload_2017-11-17_16-20-45.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 350
Last edited:
You are seriously overcomplicating things. All that is asked is how ##\omega'## and ##\vec k'## needs to be expressed in terms of ##\omega## and ##\vec k## for the expression ##\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t = \vec k' \cdot \vec r' - \omega' t'## to hold. You just need to make sure that this holds regardless of the values of ##t## and ##\vec x##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
vishnu 73 said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 215123

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


ok so for w' i am getting since the s' is only moving in x direction
##
\omega' = \omega \gamma (1 + \beta)
##
is this correct then i am having some trouble in dealing with the dot product to derive for
##
\bf {ck'}
##

This looks like a maths problem to me. Does it really matter what these variables are? You're given a set of things (four-vectors etc.) with certain properties. I'm not sure you need to make any further assumptions about the things you are dealing with, other than the mathematical relationships you are given.

PS I see @Orodruin has just said much the same thing.
 
Orodruin said:
You just need to make sure that this holds regardless of the values of ttt and ⃗xx→\vec x.
thats just what i am having problems with

PeroK said:
This looks like a maths problem to me. Does it really matter what these variables are? You're given a set of things (four-vectors etc.) with certain properties. I'm not sure you need to make any further assumptions about the things you are dealing with, other than the mathematical relationships you are given.
the problem is i am not good at maths in relativity

please give me hints
 
  • #10
Write out both sides of the equation, identify terms with the same coordinate factor ##t##, ##x##, ##y##, or ##z##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
  • #11
ok what does position vector mean like what is the r vector to event or to the moving obsever
 
  • #12
vishnu 73 said:
ok what does position vector mean like what is the r vector to event or to the moving obsever

Hint: this is a maths problem. You can forget "events" and "moving observers". Just focus on the equations now. The physics has been done by someone else: they are just asking you to do a bit of maths for them!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
  • #13
PeroK said:
Hint: this is a maths problem. You can forget "events" and "moving observers". Just focus on the equations now. The physics has been done by someone else: they are just asking you to do a bit of maths for them!
sir i understand what you are saying but i don't how to deal with the dot product how to separate the r' and k' vector when there is a dot between them thanks
 
  • #14
vishnu 73 said:
sir i understand what you are saying but i don't how to deal with the dot product how to separate the r' and k' vector when there is a dot between them thanks
I am sorry, but if you have problems with that part you are not mathematically prepared to tackle relativity. Before you can deal with relativity, you need to become more proficient in vector algebra and vector analysis.
 
  • #15
Orodruin said:
I am sorry, but if you have problems with that part you are not mathematically prepared to tackle relativity. Before you can deal with relativity, you need to become more proficient in vector algebra and vector analysis.
what level vector algebra is needed because i know the basics only
 
  • #16
@Orodruin
sir please tell what do i need to learn because i am more than happy to learn please guide me through this problem and this problem
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K