How Does Lenz's Law Explain Magnetic Field Directions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluesteels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Lenz
AI Thread Summary
Lenz's Law helps determine the direction of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying wires. The magnetic field direction is out of the page for one wire and into the page for another due to the right-hand rule, which states that the thumb points in the direction of current and fingers curl in the direction of the magnetic field. If the wire's direction changes, the magnetic field direction reverses accordingly. For an infinite straight wire, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to both the wire and the distance from it. Understanding these principles clarifies how magnetic fields behave around wires.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The current I in a long, straight wire is constant and is directed
toward the right as in Fig. E29.16. Conducting loops A, B, C, and D are moving, in the directions shown, near the wire. (a) For each loop, is the direction of the induced current clockwise or counterclockwise, or is the induced current zero? (b)
Relevant Equations
None equation
Screen Shot 2021-12-27 at 4.02.06 PM.png

This the images of the figure. I am confused on why is the magnetic field for the top wired is out and the bottom is in. Is that the general rule??

Moreover what if the wired is point to the left instead of right is the magnetic field still out of the page.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find which way the magnetic field points using an appropriate right hand rule.

1640639811841.png


For an infinite straight wire, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to the wire itself and to the separation from the wire. If you change the direction of the current, the direction of the field will also be reversed.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top