How Does Linear Drag Affect the Motion of a Thrown Beach Ball?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a thrown beach ball experiencing linear drag. The problem involves analyzing the effects of drag on the ball's height, speed upon impact, and total time of flight, with specific equations provided for each aspect.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of differential equations for velocity and height, questioning the signs and integration methods used. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between drag and gravity, particularly regarding their directions and effects on motion.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of the differential equations, with some participants suggesting adjustments to the signs and integration limits. Multiple interpretations of the drag force and its implications on the equations of motion are being examined, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of determining constants of integration due to insufficient boundary conditions. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly identifying the nature of drag in relation to the ball's motion.

BearY
Messages
53
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A beach ball is thrown upwards with initial speed v0. The drag force is given by Fd = −mαv for a drag coefficient α and speed v.
(a) the height h reached
(b) Show that the height may be expressed in terms of the final speed when the ball strikes the ground vf
(c)Finally show that the total time taken for the ball to travel up and back down is given by T = (v0 + vf )/g.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved DE for V
$$\dot{V} = \alpha V}+{g}$$
get $$t=\frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\frac{\alpha V_0 +g}{g})$$
and DE for h $$\ddot h -\alpha \dot h = g$$
get $$h = \frac{gln(\frac{\alpha V_0 +g}{g})}{\alpha ^2}+C_1\frac{g}{\alpha V_0 +g}+C_2$$
There is the problem, I can only find initiail value of ##t=0##, which does not solve the 2 constants. Is there another point of time I should use? Or there is something I did wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When an object is thrown straight up, the acceleration due to drag and the acceleration of gravity are in the same direction. This means that they must have the same sign in your differential equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
kuruman said:
When an object is thrown straight up, the acceleration due to drag and the acceleration of gravity are in the same direction. This means that they must have the same sign in your differential equation.
I am sorry I forgot to put vector signs.
 
This is a one-dimensional vector equation. Regardless of whether the positive axis is "up" or "down" the two accelerations are in the same direction, so they must have the same sign, both positive or both negative. Also, note that symbol V stands for speed as indicated in the problem; it's not a velocity. I suggest you think of it as speed otherwise you might be led astray with too many or too few negative signs. You will need a slightly different differential equation for the return trip, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
BearY said:

Homework Statement


$$\dot{\vec{V}} = -\alpha \vec{V} +{g}$$
get $$t=\frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\frac{-\alpha \vec{V_0} +g}{g})$$
and DE for h $$\ddot h +\alpha \dot h = g$$
get $$h = \frac{gln(\frac{-\alpha V_0 +g}{g})}{\alpha ^2}+C_1\frac{g}{-\alpha V_0 +g}+C_2$$
There is the problem, I can only find initiail value of ##t=0##, which does not solve the 2 constants. Is there another point of time I should use? Or there is something I did wrong?
Adding arrows over symbols doesn't make it right. See my comments in #4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
kuruman said:
Adding arrows over symbols doesn't make it right. See my comments in #4.
I will use V as speed and change the DE. But if V is pointing up, wouldn't ##\alpha V## be pointing up as well?
 
BearY said:
I will use V as speed and change the DE. But if V is pointing up, wouldn't ##\alpha V## be pointing up as well?
Yes, ##\alpha v## points up, but that's not the drag acceleration when the object is moving up. When the object is moving up, the drag acceleration is ##a_d=-\alpha v## and points down. Also, it looks like you did not integrate the diff eq. in v correctly. You need to get v as a function of time first by doing a definite integral noting that at t = 0 the speed is v = v0 (lower limits) and at t = t the speed is v = v (upper limits).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
kuruman said:
Yes, ##\alpha v## points up, but that's not the drag acceleration when the object is moving up. When the object is moving up, the drag acceleration is ##a_d=-\alpha v## and points down. Also, it looks like you did not integrate the diff eq. in v correctly. You need to get v as a function of time first by doing a definite integral noting that at t = 0 the speed is v = v0 (lower limits) and at t = t the speed is v = v (upper limits).
That's what I thought at first, drag is always opposite to V, so I thought putting a minus sign there makes it equation of motion of the entire motion. But now I am using V as speed. This is my new solution to the DE
$$
\frac{dv}{dt}=-\alpha V -g
$$$$\frac{1}{-\alpha} ln(-\alpha V -g)=t+C
$$and use t=0 v=v_0, we have
$$V=\frac{e^{\alpha t + \alpha C}+g}{\alpha}$$
$$C = \frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\alpha V_0 +g)$$
Miss clicked was going to preview
and use t=t_1 v=0, we have
$$t_1=\frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\frac{g}{\alpha V_0 +g})$$
 
Last edited:
BearY said:
That's what I thought at first, drag is always opposite to V, so I thought putting a minus sign there makes it equation of motion of the entire motion. But now I am using V as speed. This is my new solution to the DE
$$\frac{dv}{dt}=\alpha V +g$$
Look at the right hand side of the equation. You have two terms, both of which are positive. This means that the rate of change of the speed is positive which means that the object is moving faster as it goes farther up. Does this make sense? You want both quantities on the right hand side negative because both the acceleration of gravity and drag work together to reduce the speed.

Also, the presence of integration constant ##C## shows that you did not use definite integrals. Use limits when you integrate as I indicated in post #7 and the integration constants will take care of themselves.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
  • #10
kuruman said:
Look at the right hand side of the equation. You have two terms, both of which are positive. This means that the rate of change of the speed is positive which means that the object is moving faster as it goes farther up. Does this make sense? You want both quantities on the right hand side negative because both the acceleration of gravity and drag work together to reduce the speed.

Also, the presence of integration constant ##C## shows that you did not use definite integrals. Use limits when you integrate as I indicated in post #7 and the integration constants will take care of themselves.
Should I integrate right-hand side from ##V_0## to ##0##? I think I am wrong because that gives the same results.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
Look at the right hand side of the equation. You have two terms, both of which are positive. This means that the rate of change of the speed is positive which means that the object is moving faster as it goes farther up. Does this make sense? You want both quantities on the right hand side negative because both the acceleration of gravity and drag work together to reduce the speed.

Also, the presence of integration constant ##C## shows that you did not use definite integrals. Use limits when you integrate as I indicated in post #7 and the integration constants will take care of themselves.
Wait it's not exactly the same the result is $$\frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\frac{\alpha v_0+g}{g})$$
 
  • #12
BearY said:
Should I integrate right-hand side from ##V_0## to ##0##? I think I am wrong because that gives the same results.
Look at this example when ##\alpha =0## that gives a familiar equation.
$$\frac{dv}{dt}=-g~~~\rightarrow ~dv=-gdt$$ $$\int_{v_0}^{v}dv=-g\int_0^t dt~~~\rightarrow ~v-v_0=-gt~~~\rightarrow ~v=v_0-gt$$Note how the upper and lower limits are lined up; ##v_0## is the speed at ##t## and ##v## is the speed at arbitrary time ##t##. In other words, it is the speed at any time ##t##, or ##v(t)##.

Sorry, I have to leave now because it's late where I am.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BearY
  • #13
BearY said:
Wait it's not exactly the same the result is $$\frac{1}{\alpha}ln(\frac{\alpha v_0+g}{g})$$
Yes, that is the correct time ##t_{up}## for the up trip. However, you need to find ##v(t)## as I indicated before because you need to do a second definite integral of the form $$h(t_{up})=\int_0^{t_{up}}v(t)~dt.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K