How Does Mass Affect Calculations in Non-conservative Force Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristen151027
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car descending a hill, focusing on the effects of mass in calculations related to non-conservative forces, specifically friction. The problem presents parameters such as the height of the hill, the length of the slope, the frictional force, and the required speed at the bottom, but lacks the mass of the car.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the setup of energy equations, questioning the inclusion of mass and the use of angles in the calculations. There are discussions about expressing frictional force in terms of normal force and the implications of using cosine in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the setup of equations and the role of mass. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between friction and normal force, but there is no consensus on the correct approach or resolution of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of mass as a critical piece of information, which complicates the ability to solve the problem accurately. There are also discussions about the correct interpretation of angles and forces involved in the scenario.

kristen151027
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with the following problem:

"There is a car ready to go down a hill. The height of the hill is 9.0 m, and the length of the slope is 11.0 m (hypotenuse). The frictional force opposing the car is 125 N, and the car must be going 12.5 m/s when it reaches the bottom. What is the initial speed required for the car to overcome friction and reach required speed at the bottom of the hill?"

I set up the following equation: KE_i + PE_i + (frictional force)(cos 180)(11.0 m) = KE_f

I don't know if I have the right setup because whenever I try to solve it, I run into trouble because there is no mass provided and I get an answer to be around 50 (it should be a little less than 3 m/s).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can express the frictional force in terms of the normal force. Mass will thus cancel out.
 
cos 180?? That's equal to -1 but why do you have that? There is no 180 angle in your problem. If you want the cosine of the angle the hill makes, then you can use the Pythagorean theorem to get the "near side".
 
By using the pythagorean theorem and the law of sines, I found the normal force to be approx. 5.17 N, which I multiplied by 11.0 m to get 56.92 J. Correct? Then I inserted that in the equation:

KE_i + PE_i + (normal force x hypotenuse) = KE_f

But I got the wrong answer. What am I doing wrong?
 
kristen151027 said:
I set up the following equation: KE_i + PE_i + (frictional force)(cos 180)(11.0 m) = KE_f

I see nothing wrong with this equation or your approach. (The "cos 180" may look strange, but it is correct since the friction force and displacement are 180 degrees apart.)

However I don't see how you can solve the problem without additional information, such as the mass of the car.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K