How Does Mass Affect the Oscillation Frequency of a Spider's Web?

  • Thread starter Thread starter toothpaste666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillations Web
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of mass on the oscillation frequency of a spider's web, specifically analyzing a scenario where a fly of mass 0.29g is caught in the web, which oscillates at a frequency of 4.4Hz. Participants explore calculations related to the effective spring stiffness constant and the expected frequency for a heavier insect of mass 0.50g.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the formula for frequency in relation to mass and spring constant, with attempts to calculate the spring stiffness constant and the new frequency for a different mass. Some express confusion over the results and the significance of significant figures.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations, with some participants questioning the correctness of their results and others suggesting potential errors in computation or interpretation of the problem. Multiple interpretations of the expected frequency based on mass changes are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints regarding significant figures and the expectations set by the homework platform, with some expressing frustration over discrepancies in the answers provided by the system.

toothpaste666
Messages
517
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement



A small fly of mass 0.29g is caught in a spider's web. The web oscillates predominately with a frequency of 4.4Hz .

a) What is the value of the effective spring stiffness constant k for the web?

b) At what frequency would you expect the web to oscillate if an insect of mass 0.50g were trapped?

Homework Equations



f = (1/2Pi)(k/m)^.5

The Attempt at a Solution



a) rearranging the equation

k =m(2Pif)^2 = (.00029kg)(2Pi*4.4Hz)^2 = .22 N/m

mastering physics says I am right on this one. So I figured for part b I just rearrange the equation for f and plug in .0005 for m and .22 for k

f=(1/2Pi)(k/m)^.5 = (1/2Pi)(.22N/m/.0005kg)^.5 = 33Hz

but mastering physics says i am wrong. Where is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression is correct. An estimate (sqrt(2000/5) = 20) yields 20/π, around 3.
As expected: twice as heavy, 1.4 times lower freq.
 
Hmm... I'm not sure, looks like right to me. using w = root(k/m) and w = 2pif i get the same thing. Did you try 32.9hz?
 
it said 32.9 was wrong also. and it says in the question it wants 2 sig figs =[
 
Have you tried adding another sig fig? use .22 for k and .0005 for m and take it out 2 places.
 
without rounding the answer is 32.94930172. I am not sure if that's what you mean
 
Yea that's about what I got, but it wants 2 sig figs and 33 isn't working, so maybe they mis stated and want 2 after the decimal? I'm honestly not sure, toothpaste. Your algebra looks good, we got the same answer, and assuming it did in fact say that .22N/m was the correct k value (I didn't double check that), I'd probably just punch it in the face and call it a day, honestly.

Btw, I've been meaning to say something for a while, but I think your name is effing hilarious XD
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
yeah its telling me .22 N/m is correct on the first part. =[ so frustrating.

and thank you! :D i love this username!

anyways thanks for your help i guess ill email my professor, maybe there is a problem with mastering physics.
 
Listen up, you two: if a.29 g fly swings with 4.5 Hz a HEAVIER fly swings at a LOWER freq. So anything above 4.4 Hz is plain wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
By increasing the mass the frequency must decrease. You should be aware that 30 something does not make sense if the original frequency was 4.4 Hz.

Check your units and calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
(1/2Pi)(.22N/m/.0005kg)^.5 is correct.

You must be doing something wrong with your calculator. You are getting the decimal point in the wrong place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
Yea I see what you guys are saying, I kind of feel like a noob for not seeing that. That's my bad everyone =[

I just think it's weird we both got the same (wrong) thing.
 
  • #13
I forgot parenthesis on my calculator. I entered 20.976/2Pi instead of 20.976/(2Pi)... sorry guys. I got 3.3 this time and mastering physics accepted it
 
  • #14
My point is that at all times you should make a reasonable guess about the outcome:
1. The square root can't be far from 20,
2. The freq has to be lower than 4.4 by a factor of around 1.5
 
  • #15
Yea i should have noticed that. Sometimes the intuition aspect of it doesn't come very easily to me
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
33
Views
6K