How Does Modern Mathematics Prove the Pythagorean Theorem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of the Pythagorean Theorem within the framework of modern mathematics, specifically through the lens of the n-dimensional Euclidean metric defined as d(x,y) = |y-x| = \sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=0}^{n} (y_i-x_i)^2}. This definition directly leads to the theorem, demonstrating that d(<0,0>,) = || = \sqrt{a^2+b^2} implies ||^2 = a^2+b^2. The discussion emphasizes that the validity of the proof is contingent upon the accepted definitions and axioms, indicating that alternative definitions complicate the proof of the theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of n-dimensional Euclidean metrics
  • Familiarity with real analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of axiomatic systems in mathematics
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of different definitions of length in geometry
  • Explore various axiomatic systems and their impact on mathematical proofs
  • Learn about alternative proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem
  • Investigate the role of real analysis in modern mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in the foundations of geometry and the philosophical implications of mathematical proofs.

Someone2841
Messages
43
Reaction score
6
I am wondering what it means to "prove" the Pythagorean Theorem in modern mathematics. Most real analysis begins with the following definition of the n-dimensional Euclidean metric:

##d(x,y) = |y-x| = \sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=0}^{n} (y_i-x_i)^2}##

This would seem to directly imply the Pythagorean theorem!

##d(<0,0>,<a,b>) = |<a,b>| = \sqrt{a^2+b^2} \implies |<a,b>|^2 = a^2+b^2##

What bearing do these have, then: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem#Proofs
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A proof is always relative to an axiom system and to the definitions you accept. In your proof above you have accepted the definition that length is ##d(x,y) = \sqrt{\sum_{k} |x_k-y_k|^2}##. This makes the Pythagorean theorem trivial.

However, if you don't accept that definition of length, but rather some other definition, then the Pythagorean theorem is much more difficult to prove. The usual proofs of the Pythagorean theorem depend on axioms and definitions which don't make the theorem trivial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K