How Does Non-Radial Symmetry Affect the Fourier Transform of 1/|r|?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Fourier transform of the function F(\mathbf{r_1},{r_2}) = \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r_1-r_2}|} over a finite cube of unit volume, specifically addressing the implications of non-radial symmetry. When the function is modified to include constants a and b, the Fourier coefficients f_k are affected, leading to a convolution of f_k with a sinc function. The participants clarify the distinction between Fourier series expansion and Fourier transform, emphasizing the need for precise definitions of variables and integration limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and series
  • Familiarity with three-dimensional integrals
  • Knowledge of convolution theorem in Fourier analysis
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms in non-radially symmetric functions
  • Learn about the convolution theorem and its applications in Fourier analysis
  • Investigate the numerical evaluation of Fourier coefficients in complex integrals
  • Explore the implications of characteristic functions in bounded domains
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier analysis, particularly those dealing with non-standard boundary conditions and symmetry in multidimensional integrals.

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about the Fourier transform of \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}|} over a finite cube of unit volume. Where |\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}| is \sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2 + (y_1-y_2)^2 + (z_1-z_2)^2}

I know it looks like

\sum_\mathbf{k} f_k e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot (\mathbf{r_1}-\mathbf{r_2})}

where f_k is the Fourier coefficient

f_k = \frac{1}{V} \int_V \frac {e^{-i\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} } } {|\mathbf{r}| } d\mathbf{r}

over the volume {-1,1}{-1,1}{-1,1}

My question is, what happens when \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}|} is not radially symmetric. Say |\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}| is

\sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2 + a(y_1-y_2)^2 + b(z_1-z_2)^2}

would the expression then become

\sum_\mathbf{k} f_k e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot (x_1-x_2)}e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot a(y_1-y_2)}e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot b(z_1-z_2)}

and would the coefficient f_k be affected? My guess is yes it would be over the interval {-1,1},{-a,a},{-b,b}

Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!
May I ask you a couple of questions before attempting to provide an answer?

1) First of all, from the second formula in your post, the one where you have a summation, it seems that you are asking for the Fourier series expansion, not the Fourier transform, as you wrote in the title. Which one are you interested in?

2) Can you write explicitly the function (with all its variables) you want to find the Fourier transform of?

3) you have not defined r inside the integral.

4) Is r1 your variable and r2 some constant?
(note: if the answer is yes, you can first of all apply the shift-theorem to get rid of r2 inside the integral)

I personally feel that your question is formulated in a very confusing way, or maybe it's just me. Please clarify those points I asked, and then maybe we can provide some help to answer your last question on symmetry.
 
mnb96 said:
Hi!
May I ask you a couple of questions before attempting to provide an answer?

Sure! Thanks for the help.

1) First of all, from the second formula in your post, the one where you have a summation, it seems that you are asking for the Fourier series expansion, not the Fourier transform, as you wrote in the title. Which one are you interested in?

2) Can you write explicitly the function (with all its variables) you want to find the Fourier transform of?

3) you have not defined r inside the integral.

Sorry I will try and be more clear. Ultimately I am looking for the Fourier expansion, but the Fourier transform is giving me the most trouble. The function is

F(\mathbf{r_1},{r_2}) = \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r_1-r_2}|}

where r_1 and r_2 are 3 dimensional vectors. More explicitly

F(x_1,y_1,z_1,x_2,y_2,z_2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 +(y_1 - y_2)^2 + (z_1-z_2)^2}}

Normally, I just employ the Fourier coefficient

f_k = \frac{4 \pi}{k^2}

to get the expansion. But this time I am dealing with an extra complication. If any of the variables x_1,y_1,z_1,x_2,y_2,z_2 are greater than 1 or less than 0, the value of the function is 0. I.e. Instead of vanishing when the separation between r_1 and r_2 approaches infinity, the function abruptly vanishes if r_1 or r_2 is outside the unit cube. Effectively, the function outside this cuboidal boundaries is "chopped off". The form of f_k becomes:

f_k = \frac{1}{V} \int_V \frac {e^{-i\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} } } {|\mathbf{r}| } d\mathbf{r}

This is a three-dimensional integral (r is a three-dimensional vector) and is integrated over {-1,1} in each dimension. I.e.

f_k = \frac{1}{8} \int^1_{-1} \int^1_{-1} \int^1_{-1} \cdots dxdydz

4) Is r1 your variable and r2 some constant?
(note: if the answer is yes, you can first of all apply the shift-theorem to get rid of r2 inside the integral)

Unfortunately no. It is a 6-dimensional integral.
 
You can extend the domain to infinity writing the function as the product of f and the characteristic function of the cube.
Then by the convolution theorem the Fourier transform is the convolution of f_k and something like sinc(k).

Don't know if you can go any further
 
aesir said:
You can extend the domain to infinity writing the function as the product of f and the characteristic function of the cube.
Then by the convolution theorem the Fourier transform is the convolution of f_k and something like sinc(k).

Don't know if you can go any further

f_k itself isn't too hard to evaluate numerically. I don't expect to find a simple analytical form. What I am wondering is how things change when I instead deal with the function

F(x_1,y_1,z_1,x_2,y_2,z_2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 +a(y_1 - y_2)^2 + b(z_1-z_2)^2}}

where a and b are arbitrary constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K