How does permittivity in Coulomb's law work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of permittivity in Coulomb's law, specifically how it affects the calculation of electric fields and forces between point charges. Participants explore the implications of permittivity in different contexts, including the presence of dielectrics and the concept of effective permittivity in capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to consider the permittivity at a specific point or the values between two points when calculating the electric field.
  • Another participant suggests that all permittivity values in the entire space should be considered, particularly in the presence of materials with different permittivities.
  • A participant clarifies the symbols used for electric permittivity (ε), magnetic permeability (μ), and susceptibility (χ), correcting a previous mix-up.
  • There is a discussion about the effective permittivity in capacitors, with one participant proposing a formula for calculating it based on an integral approach.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the arithmetic mean approach for calculating effective permittivity between point charges.
  • A participant mentions the concept of a Faraday cage as a method to create an electric field isolator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the concept of permittivity in the context of Coulomb's law, with no clear consensus on the correct method for calculating effective permittivity or the implications of permittivity in various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the treatment of permittivity in different media and the mathematical steps involved in calculating effective permittivity. The discussion includes various interpretations of how permittivity should be applied in theoretical and practical contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and individuals exploring concepts in electromagnetism, particularly those studying Coulomb's law, electric fields, and capacitors.

Efeguleroglu
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Coulomb's Law $$ \vec{F} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2} \hat{r} $$
$$ \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r} $$
Let's say we want to find electric field with a distance r from charge Q. How does permittivity effects the magnitude? Will I choose the permittivity at point r or should I take into account all permittivity values between positions 0 and r?

In my opinion I should not only consider permittivity at point r but permittivities between 0 and r are effective as well. Because if we use q1 and q2 and calculate forces acting on each of them, we violate Newton's third law also it is not applicable in coulomb's law. But I don't know how to calculate electric field and thus forces acting on them.

If permittivity values between 0 and r are effective on the magnitude of electric field at r, then we should be able to create a electric field isolator.

I am really confused. I hope someone can help me. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Efeguleroglu said:
Will I choose the permittivity at point r or should I take into account all permittivity values between positions 0 and r?
Hi,
My guess is that you are still in an introduction phase. Correct me if I am wrong.
[edit: mixup, see post #2]
And ##\varepsilon## is used as the symbol for susceptibility, not permittivity (that is ##\mu##).

In general we start the study by considering electric fields in vacuum. And the proper way would be to use ##\ \varepsilon_0\ ## to designate the susceptibility.

To answer your (very good) question: not only all permittivity values between 0 and r, but in the entire space! Because the presence of stuff with a different ##\varepsilon## (such as dielectrics) influence the field.

So: for now assume ##\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\ ## everywhere (except in conductors) until it's clearly stated otherwise.

And:
Efeguleroglu said:
we should be able to create a electric field isolator.
We can: it's called a Faraday cage and it shields what is inside from electric fields

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
My understanding is that μ is the symbol for magnetic permeability, ε is used for electric permittivity and χ for susceptibility.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Well corrected ! Thanks.
I made a mess of it ! (cause: never use the words, always the symbols o:))
Tried to fix things a little.
 
In a capacitor, for this formula
$$ C = \epsilon \frac{A}{d}$$
dielectric constant is calculated using
$$ \epsilon_{eff} = \frac{\int\epsilon dV}{V} $$
or in 2D
$$ \epsilon_{eff} = \frac{\int\epsilon dA}{A} $$
I know capacitors are full of approximations but there is this formula and I don't know how to use it for a more fundamental level.
Maybe this is true:
Suppose we have point charges q1 and q2 with a distance L between them. Then,
$$\epsilon_{eff} = \frac{\int_0^L \epsilon dx}{L}$$
The magnitude of electric force acting on any of them is
$$F= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{eff}} \frac{q_1 q_2}{L^2}$$
I am not really sure what I am doing. I'm just assuming arithmetic mean will work in this way. Is this true?
 
BvU said:
My guess is that you are still in an introduction phase. Correct me if I am wrong.
##\ ##
Yes, I am just a poor freshman.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K