How Does Positivity in C*-Algebras Relate to Their Representations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between positivity in C*-algebras and their representations, specifically focusing on faithful nondegenerate representations and the implications of positivity for elements within the algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between an element being positive in a C*-algebra and its representation being positive in the context of bounded linear operators. They question how to prove the equivalence of positivity in both contexts.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the definition of positivity within C*-algebras.
  • One participant provides a definition of positivity and discusses the implications of positivity in terms of the structure of elements in the algebra.
  • There is a suggestion that the properties of faithfulness and nondegeneracy of the representation may play a significant role in the converse implication.

Discussion Status

The discussion is actively exploring the definitions and implications of positivity in C*-algebras and their representations. Some participants are providing definitions and reasoning, while others are questioning how these concepts interrelate, particularly in proving the equivalence of positivity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of C*-algebras, specifically focusing on the implications of positivity and the characteristics of representations. There is an emphasis on the need for clarity regarding the definitions and theorems related to these concepts.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
If I have a faithful nondegenerate representation of a C*-algebra, A:

[tex]\pi\,:\,A \rightarrow B(\mathcal{H})[/tex]

where [itex]B(\mathcal{H})[/itex] is the set of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space. And just suppose that [itex]a\geq 0 \in A[/itex]. How is the fact that a is positive got anything to do with [itex]\pi(a)[/itex] being positive?

Apparantly there is an if and only if relationship!? How does one begin to prove something like [itex]a\geq 0 \Leftrightarrow \pi(a) \geq 0 \in B(\mathcal{H})[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define positive for me again for a C* alg.
 
Let [itex]A[/itex] be a C*-algebra, and [itex]a,b \in A[/itex]. Then [itex]a\geq b[/itex] if [itex]a-b[/itex] has the form [itex]c^*c[/itex] for some [itex]c\in A[/itex]. In particular, [itex]a[/itex] is positive if [itex]a = c^*c[/itex] for some [itex]c \in A[/itex].
 
Well, one implication is obvious a positive implies pi(a) positive since pi is a *-homomorphism.

Conversely, hmm, well, faithfulness and nondegeneracy must come into it somewhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K