How Does QFT Describe or Predict the Position of a Particle?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Position Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) does not treat the position of a particle as an observable; instead, it functions as an index for quantum harmonic oscillators. In QFT, the position operator is related to the momentum operator, but it requires a Hermitian replacement known as the Newton-Wigner position operator, which varies for different particles. For massless particles, such as photons, a position operator cannot be defined. The discussion emphasizes that QFT operates primarily in momentum space, making position a parameter without physical meaning in high-energy experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with Hilbert space and Fock space concepts
  • Knowledge of momentum and position operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of the Newton-Wigner position operator
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Newton-Wigner position operator in detail
  • Explore the implications of QFT in momentum space versus position space
  • Research the treatment of massless particles in QFT, particularly photons
  • Examine Feynman diagrams and their role in QFT calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in advanced quantum mechanics and quantum field theory applications.

  • #31
bhobba said:
In posting what I did I am thinking what I read in Srednicki page 10 which says it can be done - but is difficult - in fact he states:

'it turns out that any relativistic quantum physics that can be treated in one formalism can be treated in the other. Which we use is a matter of convenience and taste. And Quantum Field Theory, the formalism in which both position and time are both labels on operators, is much more convenient for most problems'

Perhaps you can clarify what is going on?
The formalism in which both space and time are operators is explained in string-theory books, and is summarized here:

http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/String_theory/relativistic_point_particle/action
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Avodyne said:
The formalism in which both space and time are operators is explained in string-theory books, and is summarized here:

http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/String_theory/relativistic_point_particle/action

The link doesn't explain that, it only talks about the classical action, there isn't even quantization yet. And the question was how it is in QFT, no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
martinbn said:
The link doesn't explain that, it only talks about the classical action, there isn't even quantization yet.
True, but see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0702060 [Found.Phys.39:1109-1138,2009]
especially Sec. 5.2.
 
  • #34
Avodyne said:
The formalism in which both space and time are operators is explained in string-theory books, and is summarized here:

http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/String_theory/relativistic_point_particle/action

In the first place this link is not about anything discussed here.

In the second place string theory explains nothing, that is the reason which is named TON (Theory Of Nothing) these days...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K