How Does Refraction Affect Apparent Depth in a Layered Liquid System?

AI Thread Summary
Refraction significantly affects the apparent depth of objects in layered liquid systems, such as a beaker filled with water and oil. The problem involves calculating the apparent depth from both the oil and air perspectives, with the initial calculations yielding an incorrect total depth. The correct approach involves considering the refraction at each interface, leading to a revised equation that accounts for the oil's refractive index. The discussion emphasizes that the apparent depth should always be shallower than the actual depth, highlighting the importance of understanding how light bends in different media. Ultimately, the calculations need to be adjusted to accurately reflect the layered structure of the liquids.
larkinfan11
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beaker has a height of 40.0 cm. The lower half of the beaker is filled with water (n = 1.333), and the upper half is filled with oil (n = 1.48). To a person looking down into the beaker from above, what is the apparent depth of the bottom?

Homework Equations



Apparent Depth= d(n(observer)/n(object))

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe this is a two part problem, so I broke it down into that. First I solved it from the perspect of looking observing from the oil level to the water level and calculated this:

Apparent Depth= 20(1.48/1.333)=22.2

I used 20 as the distance between the water and the bottom because it was half of the size of the beaker. That may be incorrect, however.

I then used the apparent depth that I calcuated above to solve the second part from the aspect of looking at this from the air to the oil and calculated this:

22.2= d(1/1.48)
d=32.856

I then added the two together to get 55.056 cm as my total apparent depth, but the answer is incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The apparent depth should be shallower than the actual.

If the oil was not there, the depth would appear to be 20 + 20/1.33 = 35 cm. With the oil, what would it be?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
The apparent depth should be shallower than the actual.

If the oil was not there, the depth would appear to be 20 + 20/1.33 = 35 cm. With the oil, what would it be?

AM

I think I see what you're saying. With the oil there, the equation should look like this: 20/1.48 + 20(1.48/1.333) Am I on the right track?
 
larkinfan11 said:
I think I see what you're saying. With the oil there, the equation should look like this: 20/1.48 + 20(1.48/1.333) Am I on the right track?
Not quite. Just consider the depth of an object at 20 cm below the oil only. What would the apparent depth be? What if the oil extended to 40 cm? (hint: 40/1.48 = 20/1.48 + 20/1.48)? Now think of those last 20 cm in water.

AM
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top