How Does Refraction Affect Apparent Depth in a Layered Liquid System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a beaker with two different liquids, water and oil, and asks about the apparent depth of the bottom when viewed from above. The context is centered around the principles of refraction and how it affects the perception of depth in a layered liquid system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking the problem into parts, considering the effects of each liquid on the apparent depth. Questions arise about the correctness of initial calculations and the assumptions made regarding the distances and refractive indices involved.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem with participants offering insights and questioning the original poster's calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the expected behavior of apparent depth in the presence of multiple layers, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the apparent depth should be shallower than the actual depth, and there is a discussion about the implications of the oil layer on the calculations. The original poster's method and assumptions are under scrutiny, indicating a need for clarification on the setup and calculations.

larkinfan11
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beaker has a height of 40.0 cm. The lower half of the beaker is filled with water (n = 1.333), and the upper half is filled with oil (n = 1.48). To a person looking down into the beaker from above, what is the apparent depth of the bottom?

Homework Equations



Apparent Depth= d(n(observer)/n(object))

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe this is a two part problem, so I broke it down into that. First I solved it from the perspect of looking observing from the oil level to the water level and calculated this:

Apparent Depth= 20(1.48/1.333)=22.2

I used 20 as the distance between the water and the bottom because it was half of the size of the beaker. That may be incorrect, however.

I then used the apparent depth that I calcuated above to solve the second part from the aspect of looking at this from the air to the oil and calculated this:

22.2= d(1/1.48)
d=32.856

I then added the two together to get 55.056 cm as my total apparent depth, but the answer is incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The apparent depth should be shallower than the actual.

If the oil was not there, the depth would appear to be 20 + 20/1.33 = 35 cm. With the oil, what would it be?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
The apparent depth should be shallower than the actual.

If the oil was not there, the depth would appear to be 20 + 20/1.33 = 35 cm. With the oil, what would it be?

AM

I think I see what you're saying. With the oil there, the equation should look like this: 20/1.48 + 20(1.48/1.333) Am I on the right track?
 
larkinfan11 said:
I think I see what you're saying. With the oil there, the equation should look like this: 20/1.48 + 20(1.48/1.333) Am I on the right track?
Not quite. Just consider the depth of an object at 20 cm below the oil only. What would the apparent depth be? What if the oil extended to 40 cm? (hint: 40/1.48 = 20/1.48 + 20/1.48)? Now think of those last 20 cm in water.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
865
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K