How Does Repulsorlift Technology Work in Star Wars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheQuietOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star Star wars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fictional concept of repulsorlift technology in the Star Wars universe, exploring its mechanics, implications, and the challenges of integrating such technology into a working model, specifically a Podracer. Participants engage in a mix of speculative reasoning and commentary on the nature of science fiction technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that repulsorlift technology operates on principles akin to "magic," as there are no known physical laws that support such technology.
  • Others propose that the technology could be explained through fictional constructs like "elastic magnetic field repulsion" or particle emitters that interact with the ground.
  • A participant mentions the idea of interfacing with multiple universes to explain advanced technologies like antigravity and faster-than-light travel.
  • Some argue that the narrative and consistency of the technology's capabilities are more important than adhering to hard science.
  • A few participants discuss the differences between Star Wars and Star Trek, emphasizing that both franchises approach science fiction differently, with varying degrees of scientific plausibility.
  • Concerns are raised about the world-building in Star Wars, particularly regarding the economic and social structures depicted in the films.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of repulsorlift technology, with no consensus on how it could realistically function. There is a general agreement that the technology is fictional and speculative, but differing opinions on the implications and narrative importance of such technology persist.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the technology, reliance on fictional constructs, and the absence of established scientific principles that could support the existence of repulsorlifts. Discussions also touch on the broader implications of technology in storytelling.

  • #31
how about this use some kind of emitters to spew out particles( like microwaves or something close to that) to the ground that bounce off the sand then goes back up to hit the pod making it look like it floats
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
My mom probably won't let me take apart a microwave.
 
  • #33
TheQuietOne said:
My mom probably won't let me take apart a microwave.
It's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.

"I never said. I was never here."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheQuietOne and hsdrop
  • #34
ComplexVar89 said:
And when you're considering technology, you need to have some idea how engineers think, and not go with stuff, just because it's cool.
Not really. There's far more popular, successful SF franchises that operate on the Rule-of-Cool than there are that meticulously work out the rules/science behind their tech.
 
  • #35
I have to agree that Star Wars and Star Trek are vastly different things. The huge fantasy leap that a lot of sci fi space stories use is the introduction of all kinds of materials and elements that do not really exist.

I think maybe that the best bet at this point for imaging the tech of the future would require a very indepth and up to date understanding of quantum physics and string theory as well as the higher dimensional models. and then making wild imaginative leaps from there. At least if you want to try and keep it within the bounds of some vague notion of possibility. The hippies were right all along anyway. It's all vibrations man.

The thing that star wars seems to really fail on to me is the construct of the world around the characters. This becomes more and more evident as the movies progressed. the sense of the economy, especially as regards the fact that that they have all that technology and yet most of the worlds we see are like barren deserts with no manufacturing base and no middle class. IDK, the force awakens just seemed terrible, pointless and boring to me.
Star trek has the advantage of being a tv series. With a tv series you can explore many more dimensions of the reality you are portraying, spend much longer developing characters, and have much more drawn out storylines. I feel that essentially with the level of effects available to tv now, the movie as a medium has almost no point to it. Well, except the MCU stuff. Those have been pretty great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K