How Does Repulsorlift Technology Work in Star Wars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheQuietOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star Star wars
Click For Summary
Repulsorlift technology in Star Wars is largely considered fictional and operates on concepts like anti-gravity, which do not align with known physics. The discussion emphasizes that while creating sci-fi technology, it's important to establish its capabilities and limitations for consistency in storytelling. Many contributors suggest that the technology can be treated as "sci-fi magic," allowing for creative freedom without strict adherence to scientific principles. The conversation also touches on the differences between Star Wars and Star Trek, highlighting how each franchise approaches world-building and technology. Ultimately, the focus remains on narrative rather than scientific accuracy, with the understanding that imaginative leaps are essential in science fiction.
  • #31
how about this use some kind of emitters to spew out particles( like microwaves or something close to that) to the ground that bounce off the sand then goes back up to hit the pod making it look like it floats
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
My mom probably won't let me take apart a microwave.
 
  • #33
TheQuietOne said:
My mom probably won't let me take apart a microwave.
It's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.

"I never said. I was never here."
 
  • Like
Likes TheQuietOne and hsdrop
  • #34
ComplexVar89 said:
And when you're considering technology, you need to have some idea how engineers think, and not go with stuff, just because it's cool.
Not really. There's far more popular, successful SF franchises that operate on the Rule-of-Cool than there are that meticulously work out the rules/science behind their tech.
 
  • #35
I have to agree that Star Wars and Star Trek are vastly different things. The huge fantasy leap that a lot of sci fi space stories use is the introduction of all kinds of materials and elements that do not really exist.

I think maybe that the best bet at this point for imaging the tech of the future would require a very indepth and up to date understanding of quantum physics and string theory as well as the higher dimensional models. and then making wild imaginative leaps from there. At least if you want to try and keep it within the bounds of some vague notion of possibility. The hippies were right all along anyway. It's all vibrations man.

The thing that star wars seems to really fail on to me is the construct of the world around the characters. This becomes more and more evident as the movies progressed. the sense of the economy, especially as regards the fact that that they have all that technology and yet most of the worlds we see are like barren deserts with no manufacturing base and no middle class. IDK, the force awakens just seemed terrible, pointless and boring to me.
Star trek has the advantage of being a tv series. With a tv series you can explore many more dimensions of the reality you are portraying, spend much longer developing characters, and have much more drawn out storylines. I feel that essentially with the level of effects available to tv now, the movie as a medium has almost no point to it. Well, except the MCU stuff. Those have been pretty great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K