How Does Scalar QCD Beta Function Calculation Differ in Various Sources?

fenyutanchan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Compute the beta function for $g$ in Yang–Mills theory with a complex scalar field in the representation $R$ of the gauge group.
Relevant Equations
Lagrangian:
$$
\mathcal L = \frac12 Z_3 A^{a\mu} \left( g_{\mu\nu} \Box - \partial_\mu \partial_\nu + \frac1{2\xi} A^{a\mu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \right) A^{a\nu} - Z_{3g} g f^{abc} A^{a\mu} A^{b\nu} \partial_\mu A^c_\nu - \frac14 Z_{4g} g^2 f^{abe} f^{cde} A^{a\mu} A^{b\nu} A^c_\mu A^d_\nu - Z_{2^\prime} \left( \partial^\mu \bar C^a \right) \partial_\mu C^a + Z_{1^\prime g} f^{abc} A^c_\mu \left( \partial^\mu \bar C^a \right) C^b - Z_2 \left( \partial^\mu \varphi_i^\dagger \right) \partial_\mu \varphi_i - Z_m m^2 \varphi_i^\dagger \varphi + i Z_1 g A^a_\mu \left( T_R^a \right)_{ij} \left[ \varphi_i^\dagger \left( \partial^\mu \varphi_j \right) - \left( \partial^\mu \varphi_i^\dagger \right) \varphi_j \right] - Z_4 g^2 A^a_\mu A^{b\mu} \varphi_j^\dagger \left( T_R^a \right)_{jk} \left( T_R^b \right)_{ki} \varphi_i - \frac14 Z_\lambda \lambda \left( \varphi_i^\dagger \varphi_i \right)^2.
$$
I have calculated $Z$s as
$$
\begin{aligned}
Z_1 & = 1 + \frac{3g^2}{16\pi^2} \left[ 2 C(R) - \frac12 T(A) \right] \frac1{\epsilon} + \cdots, \\
Z_2 &= 1 + \frac{3g^2}{8\pi^2} C(R) \frac1{\epsilon} + \cdots, \\
Z_3 &= 1 + \frac{g^2}{24\pi^2} \left[ 5 T(A) - T(R) \right] \frac1{\epsilon} + \cdots.
\end{aligned}
$$
It shows that the $beta$-function is
$$
\beta(g) = - \frac{g^3}{96\pi^2} \left[ 19 T(A) - 2 T(R) \right] + \mathcal O(g^5).
$$
However, Srednicki shows that the $beta$-function is
$$
\beta(g) = - \frac{g^3}{16\pi^2} \left[ \frac{11}3 T(A) - \frac13 T(R) \right] + \mathcal O(g^5).
$$
I think that I have make a mistake in $Z_1$, but I cannot find it and fix it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone help me?A:The answer is that your expressions for $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correct, but the expression for $Z_3$ is wrong. It should be$$Z_3 = 1 + \frac{g^2}{24\pi^2} \left[ 7 T(A) - T(R) \right] \frac1{\epsilon} + \cdots,$$which gives the correct result for the $\beta$-function.Edit: To see this in detail, write the renormalized Lagrangian as$$\mathcal L_R = Z_1\phi_i^* D_\mu D^\mu \phi_i + Z_2 \psi^\dagger D_\mu \gamma^\mu \psi + Z_3 F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + \mathcal O(g^3).$$As Srednicki points out, the contribution to the $\beta$-function from a term of the form $g^2F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ is$$-g^3\frac{d\ln Z_3}{dg}\left(\frac{T(A)-T(R)}{24\pi^2}\right)\left(\frac{11T(A)-T(R)}{16\pi^2}\right).$$Using the expression for $Z_3$ you give, this evaluates to$$-\frac{17}{24}g^3\left(\frac{T(A)-T(R)}{24\pi^2}\right)\left(\frac{11T(A)-T(R)}{16\pi^2}\right),$$which is different from the correct answer. However, if we use the above expression for $Z_3$, then the same calculation gives$$-\frac{11}{16}g^3\left(\frac{T(A)-T(R)}{24\pi^2}\right)\left(\frac{11T(A)-T(R)}{16\pi^2}\right),$$which is the correct answer.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top