How Does Speed Affect Time Dilation in Relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter richnfg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    High speed Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between speed and time dilation as described in the theory of relativity. Participants explore mathematical formulations, interpretations of time in different frames of reference, and the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the existence of a mathematical relationship between speed and time dilation, specifically asking for an equation to determine how many years would pass on Earth compared to a traveler moving at 99% of the speed of light.
  • Another participant provides a formula related to time dilation, noting that the interpretation of time depends on the frame of reference, emphasizing the relativity of time perception between different observers.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambiguity in the scenario presented, particularly regarding whether the two years mentioned refers to the traveler's frame or an external observer's frame.
  • Some participants mention that there is substantial experimental data supporting the principles of special relativity, including references to high-speed particle decay times and practical applications like GPS.
  • A later reply challenges the notion of time slowing down, suggesting that time remains constant but is perceived differently at high speeds, proposing an alternative perspective on time as a non-absolute parameter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of time dilation and the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds. There is no consensus on the nuances of how time is perceived in different frames of reference, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding initial conditions and reference frames when discussing time dilation, indicating that without proper synchronization of clocks, ambiguities can arise in determining who experiences more passage of time.

richnfg
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)

A few questions out of pure interest here that I figured someone on the forum will probably be able to help me with.

Just wondering, in terms of maths, has there been any relationship found between the speed that you are traveling and the difference in time (from how it slows down)? So, say I wanted to travel at 99% of the speed of light for 2 years, would there be any 'equation' that could tell how many years in the future you actually are?
I'm guessing there is no real experimental data to play with, but it just crossed my mind.

I'm pretty new to this subject, so it could turn out I have no idea what I'm on about.

:P

Rich
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richnfg said:
Hello! :)

A few questions out of pure interest here that I figured someone on the forum will probably be able to help me with.

Just wondering, in terms of maths, has there been any relationship found between the speed that you are traveling and the difference in time (from how it slows down)? So, say I wanted to travel at 99% of the speed of light for 2 years, would there be any 'equation' that could tell how many years in the future you actually are?
I'm guessing there is no real experimental data to play with, but it just crossed my mind.

I'm pretty new to this subject, so it could turn out I have no idea what I'm on about.

:P

Rich
You understand, don't you, that this is a physics problem, not a mathematics problem?
Yes, there is such a formula, developed in physics, that, like any formula is written in mathematics terminology. It is, if I remember properly, that it is
[tex]t'= t\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
But you have to be careful how you interpret that. That says, that, as spaceship A passes plane B with speed v (relative to the planet), while people on planet A have "t" years pass, they will observe the people on spaceship A aging only t' years. Of course, since velocity is relative, people on spaceship A will see planet B passing them at speed v and will observe exactly the opposite.

The difficulty with your scenario is that, while you say "travel at 99% of the speed of light for 2 years", you don't say whether that 2 years is measured in the spaceship or on a frame of reference that the ship is traveling at 99% the speed of light. Of course, in the "spaceship" frame of reference, the ship is not traveling at all.

Also I have no idea what you mean by "many years in the future you actually are? "
I can't think of any frame of reference in which you will have appeared to move into the future- well any faster than the rest of use do- "one day at time"! Relative to the spaceship frame of referenence, there will be no change in the flow of time. Relative to any frame of reference in which the spaceship has non-zero speed, time will have slowed down.
 
Moreover, this is just introductory "special relativity" and is explained at length in any cheap text on that subject (or on general physics even).
 
...and there is a mountain of experimental data to go on. See the GPS thread for a practical SR problem to practice on...
 
For a one way experiment, the most commonly cited experimental data is the decay times of high speed particles. So if you traveled for two years at .99c you would be two years older - us folks back home would be a lot older - you can use the formula cited in post #2 to figure out just what that number is. The story is a bit more complicated in that it is necessary to specify initial conditions - you need to start from a common reference frame and synchronize all clocks - otherwise an ambiguity is created as to who is doing the moving and consequently who is accumulating the greater number of years.
 
richnfg said:
Just wondering, in terms of maths, has there been any relationship found between the speed that you are traveling and the difference in time (from how it slows down)?
Rich

time doesn't slow down actually ... it stays the same its just that its just that time isn't an aboslute parameter at high speeds :
per say you would make yourselft a new parameter that is absolute then that parameter would show different times in the system taht travels near c (or is near a big mass)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K