How Does Symmetrization Affect Boson Spin Degeneracies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmiller70015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of degeneracies in the context of three identical bosons confined in an infinite square well. Participants explore the implications of the symmetrization postulate on the unique spin configurations and the corresponding ground state wave function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the symmetrization postulate and the unique spin configurations of bosons. Questions arise regarding the meaning of specific symbols and terms, such as the operators S and A, and the implications of different spin states on degeneracies.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the definitions and implications of the symmetrization postulate. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the spin configurations and the need to consider the ambiguity in the problem statement. Multiple interpretations of the spin states and their contributions to degeneracies are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem regarding the spin quantum number S, which affects the degeneracy calculations. There is also uncertainty about the specific spin states available for the bosons and how many of these states are symmetric.

rmiller70015
Messages
110
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Three identical bosons are in an infinite square well of length a. Find the ground state, first and second exited states, their energies, and the degeneracies.
Relevant Equations
$$S = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha}P_{\alpha}$$
$$A = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha} \epsilon _{\alpha} P_{\alpha}$$
My question is really about the degeneracies. I know that the symmetrization postulate says that there is only 1 unique ket in the subspace ##Sym^{N}V##, but does this mean that if I know one unique spin configuration that is symmetric, say ##|33>## then is it correct to say the ground state wave function is $$C(\frac{2}{a})^{\frac{3}{2}}sin(\frac{\pi x_1}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_2}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_3}{a})|33>$$, where C is a scaling constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmiller70015 said:
Homework Statement:: Three identical bosons are in an infinite square well of length a. Find the ground state, first and second exited states, their energies, and the degeneracies.
Relevant Equations:: $$S = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha}P_{\alpha}$$
$$A = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha} \epsilon _{\alpha} P_{\alpha}$$

My question is really about the degeneracies. I know that the symmetrization postulate says that there is only 1 unique ket in the subspace ##Sym^{N}V##, but does this mean that if I know one unique spin configuration that is symmetric, say ##|33>## then is it correct to say the ground state wave function is $$C(\frac{2}{a})^{\frac{3}{2}}sin(\frac{\pi x_1}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_2}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_3}{a})|33>$$, where C is a scaling constant.
I am not sure what your S and A stand for here.
You wrote the correct spatial wavefunction. I am not sure what your ket ## |33 \rangle ## stand for either.
You said that they are bosons, but their spin is not specified? If not, then, how many different spin states can you have in the ground state?
 
kdv said:
I am not sure what your S and A stand for here.
You wrote the correct spatial wavefunction. I am not sure what your ket ## |33 \rangle ## stand for either.
You said that they are bosons, but their spin is not specified? If not, then, how many different spin states can you have in the ground state?
S and A are the operators that project a ket from ##V^{\otimes 3}## into the subspaces of symmetric (##Sym^NV##) and antisymmetric (##Anti^NV##) configurations by way of the permutation operators. I wrote ##|33>## because it's the simplest bosonic spin configuration I could think of that would be symmetric, ##|SM> = |s_1 m_1 s_2 m_2 s_3 m_3>## so ##|33> = |111111>##.

As far as how many spin configurations you can have in the ground state, that would be the dimension of ##Sym^NV##, which is the number of symmetric spin configurations for the three bosons. Since the spatial wave function is symmetric under the exchange of particles, the spin part of the wave function also needs to be symmetric. I think if I am understanding correctly, that all but one of them are degenerate states.
 
rmiller70015 said:
Homework Statement:: Three identical bosons are in an infinite square well of length a. Find the ground state, first and second exited states, their energies, and the degeneracies.
Relevant Equations:: $$S = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha}P_{\alpha}$$
$$A = \frac{1}{N!}\Sigma _{\alpha} \epsilon _{\alpha} P_{\alpha}$$

My question is really about the degeneracies. I know that the symmetrization postulate says that there is only 1 unique ket in the subspace ##Sym^{N}V##, but does this mean that if I know one unique spin configuration that is symmetric, say ##|33>## then is it correct to say the ground state wave function is $$C(\frac{2}{a})^{\frac{3}{2}}sin(\frac{\pi x_1}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_2}{a})sin(\frac{\pi x_3}{a})|33>$$, where C is a scaling constant.

rmiller70015 said:
S and A are the operators that project a ket from ##V^{\otimes 3}## into the subspaces of symmetric (##Sym^NV##) and antisymmetric (##Anti^NV##) configurations by way of the permutation operators. I wrote ##|33>## because it's the simplest bosonic spin configuration I could think of that would be symmetric, ##|SM> = |s_1 m_1 s_2 m_2 s_3 m_3>## so ##|33> = |111111>##.

As far as how many spin configurations you can have in the ground state, that would be the dimension of ##Sym^NV##, which is the number of symmetric spin configurations for the three bosons. Since the spatial wave function is symmetric under the exchange of particles, the spin part of the wave function also needs to be symmetric. I think if I am understanding correctly, that all but one of them are degenerate states.
Ah ok, so the P's are permutations.

I see that you assume that S=1. This is no stated in the question, so I think you will have to double check with your instructor because the question is ambiguous. S could be 0 (making the problem trivial) or 2, etc. The degeneracy will depend on that (unless your instructor wants an answer in terms of S, which can be worked out).
Note that if the spin is 1, the ## | m_1 m_2 m_3 \rangle=|1,1,1\rangle## is not the only state. You could also have ##( |1,1,0\rangle + |1,0,1\rangle + |0,1,1\rangle )/\sqrt{3}## and many other states. You have to count these and see the general formula in terms of S (again, if this is what your instructor wants).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
kdv said:
Ah ok, so the P's are permutations.

I see that you assume that S=1. This is no stated in the question, so I think you will have to double check with your instructor because the question is ambiguous. S could be 0 (making the problem trivial) or 2, etc. The degeneracy will depend on that (unless your instructor wants an answer in terms of S, which can be worked out).
Note that if the spin is 1, the ## | m_1 m_2 m_3 \rangle=|1,1,1\rangle## is not the only state. You could also have ##( |1,1,0\rangle + |1,0,1\rangle + |0,1,1\rangle )/\sqrt{3}## and many other states. You have to count these and see the general formula in terms of S (again, if this is what your instructor wants).
Ok, thanks, I was unclear on whether the permutations were degenerate or if the spin states were degenerate. However, if the spin states are not degenerate then there are like 27 of them for identical spin 1 boson and I'm not sure how many of those would be symmetric.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K