How does Taylor series help expand the function 1/sqrt(1-x^2)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using Taylor series to expand the function f(x) = 1/sqrt(1-x^2) around the point x0 = 0, also known as the Maclaurin series. Participants suggest two methods: the traditional Taylor series definition and trigonometric substitution with x = sin(u). The latter approach simplifies the differentiation process, yielding alternating terms of sec(u) and tan(u). Ultimately, the series can be expressed as a sum that converges, providing a useful approximation for values of x close to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and Maclaurin series
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions and identities
  • Ability to perform differentiation of functions
  • Familiarity with geometric series and convergence concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maclaurin series for common functions
  • Learn about trigonometric substitutions in calculus
  • Explore the properties and applications of geometric series
  • Practice differentiating functions involving square roots and trigonometric identities
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in series expansions, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Taylor series and trigonometric substitutions.

robgb
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
basic taylor expansion...

Hi, could some one explain how i could use the taylor series to expand out:

f(x)= 1/sqrt(1-x^2)

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trig substitution, calculate the series, convert back.
 
means nothing to me sorry, could u be a bit more specific?
Thanks.
 
Why in the world would one use a trig substitution to find a Taylor's series??

Of course, you could do this "the old-fashioned way": use the definition of Taylor's series. (By the way, you say "Taylor Series" but don't say about what point. I assume you mean the McLaurin series: about x0= 0.)

f(x)= 1/(1-x2) so f(0)= 1

f'(x)= ((1- x2)-1)'
= -(1-x2)-2(-2x)
= (2x)(1-x2)-2 so f'(0)= 0
f"(x)= 2(1-x2)-2-2(2x)(1-x2)-3 so f"(0)= 2, etc.

So far we would have f(0)+ f'(0)(x)+ f"(0)/2(x2= 1+ x2 but the derivatives quickly become very difficult to find!

I would be inclined to remember the formula for sum of a geometric series: If |r|< 1, then &Sigma;rn= 1/(1-r).

The right hand side looks a lot like 1(1- x2) if we were to take r= x2!

Yes, &Sigma;(x2)n
&Sigma; x2n= 1/(1-x2)

Since an infinitely differentiable function only has one power series, that IS the Taylor's series.
 
A taylor series is a sum of various terms comprised of factors multiplying nth derivative terms:

f(x)=f(a)+(x-a)f'(a)+ [(x-a)^2]/2!+[(x-a)^3]/31...

your function y=f(x)=1/sqrt(1-x^2) is well suited to a trigonometric substitution:

x=sin(u) (and dx/du=cos(u))

since [sin(u)]^2+[cos(u)]^2=1, y=1/sqrt(1-x^2)=sec(u)

to get f'(x)=dy/dx for the taylor series, first calculate dy/du then multiply by dx/du

dy/du=sec(u)tan(u)

multiplying the left by dx/du and the right by cos(u) (remember, dx/du=cos(u) ) yields,

f'(x)=dy/dx=tan(u)

repeating (differentiating dy/dx=tan(u) and multiplying by dx/du) to get f''(x) yields ,

f''(x)=sec(u)

you will get alternating terms of sec(u) and tan(u) with different multipliers.

When you have expressed this as a series, you can solve tan(u) and sec(u) for x, and substitute them back in.

OR, skip the whole trig substitution, and keep differentiating 1/sqrt(1-x^2) it is more straightforward, but not as satisfying.


Njorl
 
I believe if yo do it with the trig substitution, you wind up with a series like this:

1/(1-x^2)=SUM[ 1/(1-x^2) + other non-zero terms]

This indicates that the sum of the "other non-zero terms" converges to zero. It is more complicated, but I like the effect.

Also, whenever I'm working with 1/(1-x^2) I just feel like I'm using the wrong coordinate system. I realize that there is no "wrong" coordinate system, but it feels that way to me.

Njorl
 
Thanks guys.
Sorry, I left a few points out...

I need to evaluate the taylor series of that equation to second order about x=0. Then I need to compare f(0.1) with my taylor series approximation.

Does that make it simpler?

Thanks a lot for your help.
 
Halls of Ivy -

I think you missed out the spuare root in my equation when differentiating. Any chance you could show me the working again with the square root in there? ie the differentiation etc.

many thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K