How Does the Angle of an Incline Affect the Time of Descent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VooDoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between the angle of an incline and the time taken for an object to descend, utilizing the formula x = ut + 0.5at². The variables include distance (x), initial velocity (u), time (t), and acceleration (a), where acceleration is defined as a = gSinΦ, with g being the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²). The user seeks to establish a direct proportionality between time (t) and angle (Φ) to achieve a linear graph. The conclusion suggests plotting t against (sin Φ)^(1/2) or using logarithmic transformations to explore linear relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically x = ut + 0.5at²
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and its properties
  • Familiarity with graphing techniques and data visualization in Excel
  • Basic principles of logarithmic functions and their applications in data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation and application of kinematic equations in physics experiments
  • Learn about the properties of sine functions and their graphical representations
  • Investigate the use of logarithmic transformations for linearizing data
  • Practice data analysis and visualization techniques using Excel, focusing on plotting functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those conducting experiments on motion and inclined planes, as well as anyone interested in data analysis and graphing techniques in scientific research.

VooDoo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

For a physics practical investigation I will be investigating the change in height (angle) of an inclined plane and the time taken to travel down the incline.
Now for my hypothesis and results I am a bit stuck. For the hypothesis I will be using the following formula.

x=ut+.5at^2

Where:
x=distance down the incline plane (meters)
u=Initial velocity (m/s)
t=time taken to travel down (seconds)
a=acceleration down the incline plane (m/s/s meters per second per second)

Now for our situation
x=1.58
u=0
t=?
a=gSinΦ (Φ varies with different heights)

So now I can build a relationship between the height (or the angle of inclination) and the time taken to travel.

Now I substitute values into the formula to get:

x=.5at^2 (because u=0)

Then transpose:
2x=at^2
t^2=(2x)/(gsinΦ)

Now we know that the values of 2x and g (g = 9.8 = acceleration due to gravity) remain constant (well we assume they do). How do I create a direct proportionality between t and Φ ?? So I get a straight line graph when I plot the two?

Have I gone about things the wrong way?

Edit - Here is a graph of the angle versus time
 

Attachments

  • Angle-Time.gif
    Angle-Time.gif
    4.8 KB · Views: 545
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could simply plot t vs. (sin Φ)^1/2 to give you a straight line.
 
Nylex said:
You could simply plot t vs. (sin Φ)^1/2 to give you a straight line.
Hi Nylex,
is t on the vertical axis or horizontal axis?

I ploted (sinΦ)^1/2 but that just gives me a curved graph. Then I ploted (sinΦ)^-1/2 which gave me a sort of straight graph. Have I found proportionality? I got the excel spreadsheet if anyone needs it?
 
Last edited:
Given x and g to be constants your function will become
t^2 = (2x/g) * sin(phi)
t = (2x/g)^.5 * sin(phi)^.5

(2x/g)^.5 is just a scalar coefficient, don't worry about it.

Your function is reflecting the relationship t = sin(phi)^.5, there shouldn't be a linear trend because the relationship si the square root of a periodic function, so at the least it will curve. You could try logarithms in which case

log t = (log sin(phi))/2, that should be somewhat linear.
 
Hi whozum,

Is that log base to e or log base to 10?
 
Any base will work just as long as you use the same base for both sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K