How Does the Chain Rule Define the Differential of a Function on a Manifold?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The differential of a function \( f \) on a manifold \( M \) is defined using the chain rule, specifically through the relationship \( (f \circ \alpha)'(0) = df(\alpha(0)) \cdot \alpha'(0) = df(p)v \). This formulation relies on the smooth curve \( \alpha: I \rightarrow M \) where \( \alpha(0) = p \) and \( \alpha'(0) = v \). The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining the function \( g \) as \( g = \psi \circ f \circ \varphi^{-1} \) to facilitate differentiation using the chain rule, ensuring that the differential \( df \) is correctly interpreted in the context of tangent bundles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth manifolds and submanifolds
  • Familiarity with the concept of tangent bundles \( T_p(M) \) and \( T_{f(p)}N \)
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Experience with differentiable functions and their derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in differentiable manifolds
  • Explore the concept of pushforwards in differential geometry
  • Investigate the relationship between tangent bundles and vector fields
  • Review examples of differentiating functions defined on manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential geometry, and anyone interested in the application of calculus on manifolds will benefit from this discussion.

Maxi1995
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
We define the differential of a function f in

$$p \in M$$,

where M is a submanifold as follows
Untitled01.jpg

In this case we have a smooth curve ans and interval I $$\alpha: I \rightarrow M;\\ \alpha(0)= p \wedge \alpha'(0)=v$$.

How can I get that derivative at the end by using the definitions of the derivative of a function in several variables?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled01.jpg
    Untitled01.jpg
    8 KB · Views: 699
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for your answer. So I got it right, that it is possible to interpret the differential via the chain rule as $$(f \circ\alpha)'(0)=df(\alpha(0))*\alpha'(0)=df(p)v?$$
 
You define ##df(\ldots)## in a way that the chain rule holds, so the other way around. I.e. first you get a function ##g## defined by the commutativity of
$$
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
M &\;\quad \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow} &N\\
\downarrow{\varphi}&&\downarrow{\psi}\\
\mathbb{R}^m &\;\quad \stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow} &\mathbb{R}^n
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
$$
that is ##g=\psi \circ f\circ \varphi^{-1}## which you now can differentiate (with the chain rule) to define ##df##. You neglected ##\psi## in your equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K