How Does the Convection Diffusion Equation Model Temperature Near a Heat Source?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Convection Diffusion Equation to model temperature behavior near a heat source in a water bath. The initial solution revealed a non-zero derivative at the ambient boundary, which raises questions about applying a boundary condition like u'(1)=0. The challenge arises when attempting to use an exponential solution, leading to C2 equating to zero, complicating the boundary condition application. It is suggested that C2 could instead be represented by a polynomial or another function, prompting further exploration of suitable forms for f(x). The conversation emphasizes the need for appropriate boundary condition handling in differential equation solutions.
liquidFuzz
Messages
107
Reaction score
6
I'm tinkering with the Convection Diffusion Equation (a second order differential equation) to model a temperature behavior in proximity to a heat source in a water bath. Just to get going I solved the system for some arbitrarily chosen boundary conditions. The result is that the temperature at the ambient boundary has a derivative that isn't zero. This is sort of okay in my solution as it is only meant to show a likely temperature behavior. But how do I tackle this problem if I like to solve it with a boundary condition such as u'(1)=0, i.e. x=1 is at ambient temperature. The problem I have with this is that if I chose an exponential solution such as u(x) = C1 + C2 exp(x) I get C2 = 0 when I try to find the constants C.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I believe this is usually handled by letting your C2 by a polynomial and solving for the boundary conditions.
 
Okay, so C2 equals some function f(x)? A linear function..?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top