Cooling nozzle - convection power

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the modeling of convective cooling in finite element analysis (FEA) when using a moving cooling nozzle. Participants explore the challenges of accurately simulating the effects of a cooling nozzle that follows a specified path during manufacturing processes, particularly in relation to convection heat transfer calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the need to define the film coefficient and ambient temperature for calculating convective heat flux in FEA, suggesting the use of existing features for moving heat sources to model a cooling nozzle.
  • Several participants seek clarification on what constitutes a "moving cooling nozzle," indicating a lack of shared understanding of the term.
  • A participant elaborates that the cooling nozzle affects only small parts of the surface at different times, complicating the simulation of convection which is typically applied to the entire surface.
  • Another participant proposes that the movement of the nozzle could disrupt established convection flows temporarily, and that the evaluation should consider the speed of the nozzle and the area affected.
  • One participant requests a visual representation to better understand the geometry involved in the cooling process.
  • A later reply provides an example from friction stir welding to illustrate the concept of a moving cooling nozzle, linking it to practical applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the definition and implications of a moving cooling nozzle, with multiple viewpoints on its effects on convection and modeling challenges. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to simulate this scenario in FEA.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current FEA software capabilities regarding the simulation of localized convection effects due to moving cooling nozzles, as well as the need for clearer definitions and visual aids to facilitate understanding.

FEAnalyst
Messages
348
Reaction score
149
TL;DR
Is it reasonable to calculate power of convective heat transfer ?
Hi,

when modeling convective cooling in FEA one needs to define film coefficient ##h## and ambient temperature ##T_{amb}##. The software calculates convective heat flux using this data and current surface temperature ##T_s##: $$q=h(T_{s}-T_{amb})$$ However, modeling of moving cooling nozzle may be problematic in FEA software. Some programs have special features meant for moving heat sources (torch/laser) where the user defines position of the tool at a given time and specifies its power. Would it make sense to use this feature for moving cooling nozzle, i.e. calculate the power of convective heat transfer using the above equation (it should be possible to determine surface temperature at the current nozzle location) and simple relation: ##P=q \cdot A## ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is a "moving cooling nozzle?"
 
Chestermiller said:
What is a "moving cooling nozzle?"

I was thinking about manufacturing processes where cooling nozzle follows specified path. It’s not easy to simulate something like that in FEA software because normally convection is applied to whole surface. But cooling nozzle would affect only small parts of the surface, each part at different moment of time.
 
FEAnalyst said:
I was thinking about manufacturing processes where cooling nozzle follows specified path. It’s not easy to simulate something like that in FEA software because normally convection is applied to whole surface. But cooling nozzle would affect only small parts of the surface, each part at different moment of time.
I'm unable to picture the geometry. Perhaps a sketch would help.
 
I guess the nozzles would locally and temporarly disrupt any established convection flow if they move quickly on a horizontal plane.
With sufficient time after the nozzle goes by, the convection may reach balance again.
At the same time, the blowing action of the nozzle would temporarily energize the heat transfer along its path.
If the above is true, the evaluation of the whole situation should consider speed of movement and blowed area/total area rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K