How Does the Definition of Work Affect the First Law of Thermodynamics Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the importance of accurately defining the direction of energy transfer in the context of work done on a system, specifically a gas. It emphasizes that the interpretation of the first law of thermodynamics can vary based on how work (W) is defined in different textbooks, leading to equations that either add or subtract W. The change in internal energy (ΔU) is consistently represented as being influenced by both heat (Q) and work (W). Clarification is sought on which equation represents work done on the gas, with the consensus that ΔU = Q + W applies when W is defined as work done on the gas. Understanding these definitions is crucial for correctly applying the first law of thermodynamics.
Nick tringali
Messages
71
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
I picked choice A but the Answer is choice B. The book literally states that when work is done on the system work is negative. I get that when it’s Adiabatic the equation simplifies to U=-W making it U=-(-W). Is this like a trick question? Why would the book tell me that when work is done on the system work is negative then also ask a question and state it’s actually positive. Hope this question makes sense.
Relevant Equations
Delta U= Q-W
91901605-3D5B-4E5B-B6A6-5D80033CA8A7.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 6A793973-F975-4ADD-A579-B0DDA21F8C55.jpeg
    6A793973-F975-4ADD-A579-B0DDA21F8C55.jpeg
    52.2 KB · Views: 119
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @Nick tringali.

You have to be very careful when thinking about the direction of energy-transfer when work is done (on something by something else).

Your textbook link says "... W is the work done by the system" [my underlining].
But the question is about "the work done on the gas" [my underlining; and of course 'the gas' is 'the system' here].
 
  • Like
Likes Nick tringali and Chestermiller
Yes, one needs to be careful about the preposition and be careful about who does the work and on whom work is done. It doesn't help that the first law appears as ##\Delta U=Q+W## in some textbooks and as ##\Delta U=Q-W## in others. Both are correct depending on the definition of ##W## in the textbook. As usual, ##\Delta U## is the change in internal energy and ##Q## is the heat that enters the gas.

To Nick tringali: Can you tell in which equation ##W## stands for "work done on the gas" and why? If so, then you understand what is going on here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nick tringali
kuruman said:
Yes, one needs to be careful about the preposition and be careful about who does the work and on whom work is done. It doesn't help that the first law appears as ##\Delta U=Q+W## in some textbooks and as ##\Delta U=Q-W## in others. Both are correct depending on the definition of ##W## in the textbook. As usual, ##\Delta## is the change in internal energy and ##Q## is the heat that enters the gas.

To Nick tringali: Can you tell in which equation ##W## stands for "work done on the gas" and why? If so, then you understand what is going on here.
I would say that U= Q+W equation is where W stands for work done on the gas. When work is done on the gas it increases the internal energy so +W being work done on the gas would make sense . Right?
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top