How does the quantum model justify accelerating electrons not losing energy?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of classical models, like the Planetary and Bohr models, in explaining why electrons do not lose energy while accelerating around the nucleus. It highlights that in quantum mechanics, electrons exist in stationary states where there is no acceleration, thus preventing energy loss as electromagnetic radiation (EMR). The quantum model allows for stable electron orbits that are quantized, meaning only certain energy levels are permissible, which prevents continuous energy loss. Participants express confusion over the implications of quantum mechanics on electron behavior and the nature of atomic structure. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the need for a shift from classical to quantum understanding to accurately describe atomic phenomena.
  • #31
alxm said:
A spinor describing an electron needs to be spatially rotated by 4 Pi. So? They're not three-dimensional objects.

In short: You don't understand quantum mechanics.

I think you should study more about quantum mechanics.

Spinor is three-dimensional objects. (But I do not believe spin, so this is not my opinion.)

Because One experiment in 1975 showed that the spinning neutrons return to their original configuration when they are rotated by an angle of 4π (not 2π) .
(H.Rauch et al., Phys.Lett. 54A(1975) 425)

But I think this is caused by the fact that netron g factor is -3.826. The spin angular momentum is 1/2 hbar, So this g-factor is twice the value which I expect(-1.913). I think the angular momentum is hbar.
1/2 is based on the Shrodinger equation which I do not believe.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K