MHB How does the row picture differ from the column picture in linear systems?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the differences between the row picture and the column picture in linear systems. The row picture represents equations graphically, while the column picture illustrates how vectors combine to form a solution. A unique solution occurs when the lines in the row graph intersect, indicating linear independence of the vectors in the column graph. No solution arises when the lines are parallel or one equation lacks a graph, while infinite solutions occur with coinciding lines. The relationship between these representations is crucial for grasping concepts of linear independence and dependence.
otownsend
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I hope someone can help. I'm wanting to get a better grasp on the connection between the row picture v.s. the column picture of linear systems and their solutions. In the picture below, the row picture are the three graphs on the top and their corresponding column pictures are below them:

View attachment 7384

Clearly there is a pattern here in terms of what to expect the linear system of equations to look like graphically when it is represented in row form v.s. column form.

What I would like help on is the how a column picture like the one below would be represented as a row picture (sorry for it being a bit fuzzy):

View attachment 7386

I know that this solution exists and that there are infinite solutions, however I have no clue how this would be represented in the form of a column picture. I hope this makes sense.

If someone could explain this while also mentioning how this relates to linear independence and dependence that would be great.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-10-15 at 8.42.49 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-15 at 8.42.49 PM.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 142
  • 22522357_1555394117850010_897099085_o.jpg
    22522357_1555394117850010_897099085_o.jpg
    108.4 KB · Views: 120
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi otownsend! Welcome to MHB!

In the row graph the intersection has coordinates x and y.
That corresponds to the column graph where $\mathbf b$ is a linear combination of $\mathbf a_1$ and $\mathbf a_2$ with factors x respectively y.

If we have a unique solution, the lines in the row graph intersect, and $\mathbf a_1$ and $\mathbf a_2$ are independent in the column graph, so that they can construct $\mathbf b$.

If there is no solution, either the lines in the row graph are parallel and do not coincide, or one of the equations does not have a solution at all, meaning it has no graph.
And $\mathbf a_1$ and $\mathbf a_2$ are on the same line while $\mathbf b$ is not on that line, meaning it can't be constructed, or one of $\mathbf a_1$ and $\mathbf a_2$ is zero, while $\mathbf b$ is not.

If there are infinitely many solutions, we can have coinciding lines, or one of the equations has infinitely many solutions, while the other has at least 1 solution.
I'll leave it up to you to figure out what that means for the columns graph. (Wink)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
999
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K