How does tire pressure affect distance traveled by a bicycle coasting to a stop?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between tire pressure and the distance a bicycle coasts to a stop, emphasizing the role of rolling resistance. Participants highlight that rolling resistance is inversely related to tire pressure and is influenced by the load carried by the tires. A definitive formula for calculating stopping distance based solely on tire pressure does not exist; instead, experimentation is necessary to derive a correlation. Key factors affecting rolling resistance include tire pressure, load, and surface roughness, with suggestions for practical experiments to validate hypotheses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rolling resistance and its impact on bicycle dynamics.
  • Familiarity with Newton's Laws of motion.
  • Basic knowledge of tire mechanics and pressure effects.
  • Experience with experimental design and data analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of rolling resistance in bicycles and its dependence on tire pressure.
  • Learn about experimental methods for measuring rolling resistance and stopping distances.
  • Investigate the effects of different tire widths and materials on rolling resistance.
  • Explore the relationship between load, tire pressure, and contact patch area in bicycle tires.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, bicycle enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the mechanics of cycling and tire performance optimization.

  • #31
phyzguy said:
If you actually do the experiment, you will find that your initial assumption of, "with negligible air resistance" is a bad assumption. Unless you are moving very slowly, air resistance is the primary drag on a bicycle.
Once the force law is nailed down, there is a differential equation lurking here.

For purely linear drag (drag proportional to velocity), the time taken to come to a stop is infinite, but the distance taken to come to a stop should be finite -- the sum of a decaying geometric series.

[The time taken to halve the velocity is a constant and you never finish halving the velocity. But the distance traversed each time you halve the velocity is also halved]

For purely quadratic drag, both the time and distance taken to come to a stop should be infinite.

[The time taken to halve the velocity doubles each time you halve the velocity. So it still takes forever to slow down. This time the distance travelled for each halving is constant -- half the velocity for twice the time. So the total distance is infinite]

With a mix of linear drag and quadratic drag, there will be a rapid decay of velocity after which the linear drag will dominate. So an assumption of negligible air resistance after some point is not completely unreasonable [which point is already well understood by @phyzguy].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mikeyyy said:
No, I hunk it’s the sharpness of the bend as the tire rolls onto the flat area
Sorry, I'm a little slow on Jive. What's "hunk" in this context?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K