How Electromagnetic Waves Pass Through Holes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interaction between electromagnetic (EM) waves and Faraday cages constructed from wire mesh. Key points include the relationship between the size of mesh holes and the wavelength of the EM waves, specifically how shorter wavelengths, such as those from 3G signals, can pass through smaller openings compared to longer wavelengths. The conversation highlights the importance of polarization, conductor-to-gap ratios, and the geometry of the cage in determining the effectiveness of wave suppression. Participants emphasize that while vertical conductors reflect vertically polarized waves, horizontally polarized waves can pass through more easily due to the induced currents in the conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave properties and behavior
  • Knowledge of Faraday cage design principles
  • Familiarity with wave polarization concepts
  • Basic grasp of antenna theory and function
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of wave polarization on signal transmission through conductive materials
  • Explore the principles of electromagnetic wave diffraction and scattering
  • Study the design and optimization of Faraday cages for specific frequency ranges
  • Learn about the relationship between antenna design and electromagnetic wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Electromagnetic engineers, physicists, telecommunications professionals, and anyone involved in designing or utilizing Faraday cages for signal shielding and interference reduction.

  • #31
Every face of the cage can be expected to have currents induced on it, actually, whatever the aspect, particularly when you have an open structure (imperfect).

To avoid confusion, I was discussing the face that is normal to the direction of the wave progress. This corresponds to the simplest treatment of the screen. Of course, the currents will be maximum in the plane of polarisation of the wave and currents will flow all over the face. Depending on the dimensions (in wavelengths) there will be an uneven distribution of currents with nodes and antinodes. Did I ever suggest that the currents would only be on a "vertical edge"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It should also be pointed out that a wavelength is both a temporal and spatial property. If we have a uniform plane wave, then we would see the phase of the fields vary in space over the distance of a wavelength in addition to the variation of the phase at a single point over the time of a single cycle. So the wavelength is not the distance between peaks in time (that would be the period), it is the spatial distance between peaks at a given point in time (assuming a monochromatic uniform wave).
 
  • #33
I think you are taking a step too far with that one. WaveLENGTH is clearly a distance and Period is a time. They are different variables- hence the representation of a progressive wave as:

E = E0Cos(ωt - kx)

And the well known relationship for wave speed:
c = λf

You can have an oscillation with no wave motion at all

E = E0Cos(ωt)

Or a stationary 'picture' of a sinusoid:

E = E0Cos(kx)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K