How far will a box slide with given initial velocity, friction, and mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter subopolois
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Slide
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining how far a box will slide given its initial velocity, the coefficient of kinetic friction, and its mass. The problem involves concepts from kinematics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore kinematic equations and energy methods to solve the problem. Questions arise about the validity of the approaches and the calculations involved. There is a focus on comparing results from different methods.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the original poster's calculations and suggested alternative methods. There is an ongoing exploration of the differences in results obtained through various approaches, with some guidance offered on checking arithmetic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the coefficient of kinetic friction and how it affects the distance the box slides. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations without resolving them.

subopolois
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How far will a box slide if its initial velocity is 1.5 m/s, kinetic friction is 0.15 and the object is 30 kg

Homework Equations


a= (kinetic friction)(acceleration due to gravity) and
V(final)^2 - V(initial)^2 = 2(a)(D)

The Attempt at a Solution


a= 0.15 x 9.81 m/s^2
= -1.47 m/s^2 (negative since it is slowing down)

D= V(final)^2 - V(initial)^2 / 2a
= 0 - (1.5 m/s)^2 / 2(-1.47 m/s^2)
= -2.25 m/s^2 / -2.94 m/s^2
= 0.76 m

did i do everything right? seems to me like it should go a little further given the value of friction...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me!
 
You solved it using kinematics, which is perfectly fine. What other approach might you have used?
 
Id say id be able to use kinetic energy to solve it, yay or nay?
 
subopolois said:
Id say id be able to use kinetic energy to solve it, yay or nay?
Yes, you could use energy methods to solve this. Good!

(Try setting it up enough to convince yourself that you get the same equation in the end.)
 
ok so let's say i use energy. I have this equation
v(initial)^2 = 2(mu)(g)(delta r)

and i rearrange to find r
r= v(initial)^2 / 2(mu)(g)

I put all my numbers in and i get a different answer, 0.54 meters. what did i do wrong?
 
subopolois said:
ok so let's say i use energy. I have this equation
v(initial)^2 = 2(mu)(g)(delta r)

and i rearrange to find r
r= v(initial)^2 / 2(mu)(g)
Looks good. Note that this is exactly the same equation you ended up with when you solved it using kinematics.

subopolois said:
I put all my numbers in and i get a different answer, 0.54 meters. what did i do wrong?
Check your arithmetic.
 
ahhh. forgot to square the initial velocity. Thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
929
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K