How Fast Do Forces Like Gravity and Magnetism Act Compared to Light?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasi426
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Speed Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the propagation speeds of fundamental forces such as gravity, magnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces, particularly in relation to the speed of light. Participants explore whether these forces act instantaneously or at speeds comparable to or slower than light, and the potential influence of the medium through which they act.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that all fundamental forces are mediated by bosons, with gravity and electromagnetism described by massless bosons that propagate at the speed of light, while the weak force is mediated by massive bosons, suggesting a slower speed.
  • There is a question regarding the masslessness of gluons and what that implies, with some uncertainty expressed about the definition of "massless."
  • One participant requests experimental evidence to support claims that forces travel at the speed of light, questioning the relevance of the medium in this context.
  • Another participant references a paper suggesting that gravity may propagate faster than light, citing the Poynting-Robertson effect as a basis for this claim, but acknowledges a lack of consensus on the validity of this paper.
  • Concerns are raised about the credibility of the referenced paper due to its absence from peer-reviewed journals, with a participant emphasizing the importance of peer review in establishing scientific credibility.
  • Some participants argue that all known forces and particles travel at or below the speed of light, while introducing the concept of tachyons, which are theorized to travel faster than light but have not been observed.
  • Discussion includes a historical reference to an experiment by Fomalont and Kopeikin that purportedly measured the speed of gravity, with conflicting interpretations from other physicists regarding its validity.
  • One participant discusses the implications of Newtonian gravity, suggesting that if gravity had a finite speed, it would lead to instability in planetary orbits, thus raising questions about the accuracy of Newtonian theory compared to general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the propagation speeds of forces, with no consensus reached on the speed of gravity or the validity of the referenced paper. The discussion remains unresolved with differing interpretations of experimental evidence and theoretical implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the speed of gravity has not been conclusively measured, and the discussion includes references to ongoing debates in the scientific community regarding the implications of general relativity and alternative theories.

  • #61
Just to go for the record to prevent any threads like this from popping up:

1. Nothing outruns light.
2. All forces operate at the speed of light in a perfect vacuum.
3. Please do not post dumb questions like this ever without considerable research on the subject.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #62
KY girl said:
Also - in the recent Nova special about Einstein they showed his "thought" experiment of looking into a mirror while traveling at the speed of light. He theorized that you would never see your reflection because the light couldn't travel faster than you in order for your eyes to see the reflection.
I doubt you saw that. In fact, I suspect you misinterpreted an argument of just the opposite. All motion is relative- it makes no sense to talk about moving near the speed of light (of course, you can't move "at the speed of light") without saying what that speed is relative to. If you and the mirror are moving, relative to the earth, at the same very high speed, then you and the mirror are motionless relative to each other. The situation would be exactly the same as if you were sitting at home.

But here's my QUESTION:
If you and a friend are holding a mirror BEFORE going the speed of light, and you both see your reflection...what happens to that reflection once you REACH the speed of light and the friend moves out of the way of the mirror? Will her reflection still be there and stay there until you decelerate?

Thanks in advance for your responses! I live in a rural area...and I can't find anyone willing to ponder this stuff with me!
You CAN'T "reach the speed of light". Even allowing for that, your question is ambiguous. Do both you and your friend accelerate or just you? Why does your friend "move out of the way of the mirror"? Was he blocking your view to begin with?
 
  • #63
In fact light is the fastest.
I want to tell you an example of faster velocity than light.
Intefering two or more monochromatic waves we find two different velocities,
Phase velocity & group velocity.
Phase velocity can be more than the speed of light,but not the group velocity.
In fact it 's the group velocity that carries the energy,and phase velocity doesn't do.
So, all the physical information carrying pulses transport slower than light or as fast as that.
 
  • #64
What is the phase velocity, if it is not photons, why does it excist?
 
  • #65
Phase velocity is the speed at which the nodes (or another point of constant phase) propagates in a wave packet.

Group velocity is the speed at which the wave packet itself propagates.

A wave packet is simply a collection of one or more frequencies propagating together.

Claude.
 
  • #66
quark said:
The content of the paper seems plausible. It is worth reading http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp

This is pretty wrong. If you have a situation in which the force points at where the sun was a few minutes ago, then yes you will get a system that is unstable, but gravity doesn't work that way. Gravity works with fields, not forces.

Imagine a ball rolling on a rubber sheet. The ball causes a depression on the rubber sheet that spreads outward at the speed of light. Now imagine the ball starting to move. The depression will start to bunch up in front of the ball, and expand behind the ball. Now you ask in what direction the forces will point at, and it turns out that they will point directly at where the ball is at a particular moment rather than were the ball was a few minutes ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #67
The reason you can't exceed the speed of light is that the speed of light is always the same. One really *weird* thing about light is that it always seems to be traveling at the same speed. If you run after a car, then if you run fast enough, then you will catch up with it. If a car is running at 50 mph, you run toward it at 10 mph, the car will appear to be moving away at 40 mph. If you run in the opposite direction the car will be moving way at 60 mph.

Light doesn't work this way. No matter how fast you are running, a beam of light is always moving away from you at the same speed. If you run toward a beam of light at 10 mph, the speed of light will be c. If you run away from a beam of light at 10 mph, 100 mph, 10000 mph, the speed of light will still be c.

This is weird, but it seems to he how the universe works.
 
  • #68
This thread was also started 4 years ago.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K