How Fast Will Zeke Slide Down the Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter batman617
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the speed of Zeke sliding down a snow hill using the equation v = √(2gh). Given Zeke's mass of 76 kg and the mat's mass of 2 kg, the calculation assumes a vertical drop of 1.2 m. The correct application of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²) leads to a speed of 4.85 m/s. However, clarification is needed on whether the 1.2 m is vertical or along the slope, as this affects the calculation significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy principles
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations, specifically v = √(2gh)
  • Knowledge of the distinction between vertical and slope measurements in physics problems
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of gravitational potential energy and its conversion to kinetic energy
  • Learn about the effects of slope angles on gravitational acceleration components
  • Study the implications of friction in motion problems
  • Explore advanced physics problems involving inclined planes and forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of sliding objects on inclines.

batman617
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Zeke begins to slide down a snow hill on a rubber mat. Zeke's mass is 76 kg and that of the mat is 2kg.



Homework Equations


Disregarding frictional forces, how fast are they moving when they are 1.2 m below the crest?



The Attempt at a Solution


v=(square root)2gh
v=(square root)(2)(9.8)(-1.2)
v=4.85 m/s

I don't think this is even close to being right, as a friend who I just got done talking to (and is 10x smarter than me) said he got a completely different answer.

By the way, hello everyone! I just signed up, hoping to learn to understand physics better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, we do hope you understand better from now on.

Does the problem mention 1.2 m vertically below the crest or 1.2 m along the slope?

If it's the first case, your eqn is correct, except for the minus sign under the sqrt. Is that possible?

If it's the second case, you'll have to take the component of g along the slope.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K