How have we figured out the Plank length of the universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the Planck length, its definition, and the methods by which it has been determined. Participants explore the theoretical implications of the Planck length in the context of physics, particularly regarding quantum mechanics and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about how the Planck length was determined and its significance in physics.
  • Others argue that the Planck length is a defined unit, similar to the meter or foot, rather than a discovered measurement.
  • There is a suggestion that the Planck length represents a scale where classical physics fails and quantum effects become significant.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the physical significance of the Planck length, noting that it cannot currently be measured experimentally.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the interpretation of the Planck length as the "quantum of length," with some arguing that without experimental validation, such claims are speculative.
  • Participants mention that Planck units, including the Planck charge and resistance, do not possess any inherent mystical properties.
  • Humorous remarks are made about the Planck length and Max Planck, indicating a lighter tone amidst the technical discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the significance and definition of the Planck length, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on its theoretical importance, while others challenge its practical relevance and the interpretations surrounding it.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the inability to experimentally measure lengths at the scale of the Planck length and the dependence on various physical constants for its definition. The discussion reflects ongoing debates about the implications of the Planck length in theoretical physics.

hsdrop
Messages
324
Reaction score
114
how have we figured out plank length of the universe ?and know its that size ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This makes no sense. It's like saying "have we figured out the radius of an apple for a skyscraper?".
 
lol sorry ok i know we have a Planck length i was wondering how we found it
 
Like we "found" the foot or the meter. We defined it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100
hmmmm it always the easy questions that are the most difficult to answer,lol. i know we have a minimum length that we can mescher SA particles with i was just wondering how we came up with it or how we knew that it was the smallest light we can mescher by sorry for not being more chear with my question and thank you for replying
 
hsdrop said:
hmmmm it always the easy questions that are the most difficult to answer,lol. i know we have a minimum length that we can mescher SA particles with i was just wondering how we came up with it or how we knew that it was the smallest light we can mescher by sorry for not being more chear with my question and thank you for replying

Plank length was defined from several other physical constants. PL, versus lengths we can actually currently measure are several orders of magnitude apart. I think the last thing I read had the smallest length measured somewhere around 10^-18m. Which is incredibly small, but no where near PL at 10^-35m.

So PL has use in theory, but we don't have any way to currently measure lengths that small. It would also be wrong to say it is the minimum length that can be measured - we can't yet test that experimentally.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Vanadium 50 said:
Like we "found" the foot or the meter. We defined it.

I don't think we did.

The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and space-time cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. This is the
'quantum of length," the smallest measurement of length with any meaning.

And roughly equal to 1.6 x 10-35 m or about 10-20 times the size of a proton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Algr said:
The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and space-time cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. This is the
'quantum of length," the smallest measurement of length with any meaning.

And roughly equal to 1.6 x 10-35 m or about 10-20 times the size of a proton.

The quote seems like gobblygook. There is no current physical significance of PL, and no way to actually test what happens when you measure lengths that small. For all we know QG could very well require other physical constants than c, G, ##\hbar##. Plank just happened to define this length a certain way.

I don't think it correct to say
This is the "quantum of length" the smallest measurement of length with any meaning

Without experiments, no physics. Just half-blind speculation.
 
Student100 said:
The quote seems like gobblygook.

For good reason.

Planck units have no mystical power. The Planck charge is 11.7 electron charges. The Planck resistance is 30 ohms. Nothing magic happens there. It's probably true that quantum gravity becomes important at a scale of perhaps 10 or 20 Planck lengths, but that's just a statement about the relative sizes of h, c and G.
 
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
The Planck charge is 11.7 electron charges. The Planck resistance is 30 ohms.

The Planck flavor is Blueberry Fudge. The Planck address is 1325 Maple st. But that doesn't invalidate EVERYTHING Max Planck did.

BTW, Some of the formatting was lost in that quote (Those are supposed to be exponents, not ranges.) Let's see if this works:

https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/41c085ebc8add3aad57122d5d1487068b21154bd
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
  • #11
Algr said:
The Planck flavor is Blueberry Fudge. The Planck address is 1325 Maple st. But that doesn't invalidate EVERYTHING Max Planck did.

BTW, Some of the formatting was lost in that quote (Those are supposed to be exponents, not ranges.) Let's see if this works:

[PLAIN]https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/41c085ebc8add3aad57122d5d1487068b21154bd[/QUOTE]
hay you have his phone number I want to call him up and ask how "small" he really is
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
hsdrop said:
hay you have his phone number I want to call him up and ask how "small" he really is

What is that supposed to mean? Are you implying that Max Planck had a small member? That is a horrible joke (though telling).
 
  • #14
hsdrop said:
how have we figured out plank length...
hsdrop said:
I want to call him up and ask how "small" he really is
Well, now you've done it !... :olduhh:

You're on Max's "really, really bad" list... he's likely to whop you on the head with a big board .... lol

See... he doesn't look very happy about being made sport of....:oldgrumpy:

800px-Max_Planck_1933.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K