How High Can a Garbage Can Ride on a Geyser's Force?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an inverted garbage can suspended by water from a geyser, with a focus on determining the maximum height the can can reach due to the geyser's force. The context includes variables such as the weight of the can, the speed of the water, and the rate at which water is expelled.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumptions made regarding acceleration and the forces acting on the garbage can. Some question the derivation of the force equations and the values assigned to variables. Others explore the implications of setting acceleration to zero and the resulting height calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided calculations and reasoning that align with the professor's approach, while others express confusion and seek clarification on the assumptions and equations used.

Contextual Notes

There are multiple variables involved, and participants note that the values for weight, water expulsion rate, and initial velocity are not fixed, leading to different interpretations of the problem. The original poster expresses uncertainty about solving the differential equations presented.

i.mehrzad
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An inverted garbage can of weight W is suspended in air by water from a geyser.The water shoots up from the ground wit a speed v0 at a constant rate k. What is the maximum height the garbage can rride on due to the force on the water.What assumption have you made while solving this problem.

Homework Equations


dp/dt=F


The Attempt at a Solution


Assumption.e=1 so the force k wil apply on the can will be maximum as the change in p will be maximum.

Then come the force equation of the body.

2kv-w=ma
here v is a function of height.
v=sqrt(v0^2-2gh)

Now what we have is a differentiol equation which we have to solve and finally we will have to equate dh/dt=0.

My professor in class has taken the acceleration of the garbage can as zero and has got the answer os 15.3 when the answer is actually q7.

Since i don't know how to slve this equation can someone actually help me out.

According to the book the value of hmax should be approx17.

Thanking you,
Mehrzad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is k given in kg/s ? Where does the 2kv come from... wouldn't it just be kv? Can you give the numbers for this problem...
 
i.mehrzad said:
My professor in class has taken the acceleration of the garbage can as zero
This sounds reasonable to me. After all, the garbage can is assumed to be suspended. So no need to solve any differential equations.

and has got the answer os 15.3 when the answer is actually q7.
Are you given values for W, k, and v0?
 
In the given sum all the values that is k,W,m are variables. I need an equation relating the height between the max. height and these variables. in order to check the answer the following have been given.

[tex]v_o=0m/s[/tex]
W=10 kg
k=.5kg/s
 
I am sorry
[tex]v_o=20m/s[/tex]
 
v0=20m/s
 
Using these values (W = 10 N, not 10 kg) and the same simplifying assumptions, I get the same answer as your professor. Do you see how we got that answer?
 
I have an argument with what my sir did in vlass.

What i am saying is that when the acceleration is equated to 0 then the answer which we get is 15.3.

But note that when a body moves with constant velocit a=0 but still it is at a greater height and that is why(according to me) there is a difference.

So therefore what i thought is right is to find h=f(t) and then equate dh/dt=0 which will indicate the instant where the garbage can does not move therefore it is the maximum height.

For this we will have to solve the differential equation which i have no clue of how to solve.
Here is the equation once again

[tex]2k(v_o^2-2gh)^\frac{1}{2}-W=2\frac{d^2h}{dt^2}[/tex]

From this we will have to evaluate [tex]\frac{dh}{dt}[/tex] and then finally equate that to 0.

If there is anything wrong in my thinking then please correct me.
Thanking you.
 
Not sure I fully understand the problem, particularly the simplications that are being used... shouldn't the force a fluid exerts on an object be proportional to v^2 (with v being relative velocity between the fluid and the object?) Anyway, going with 2kv...

Assuming that g = 10, W = 10N, hence m = 1kg, vo = 20m/s, k=0.5

Shouldn't the equation be:

2k(vfluid - vobject) - w = ma

substituting in everything...

[tex]v_{fluid} - \frac{dh}{dt} - 10 = \frac{d^2h}{dt^2}[/tex]

Then using the equation for the speed of the fluid

[tex]\sqrt{400-20h} - \frac{dh}{dt} - 10 = \frac{d^2h}{dt^2}[/tex]

so the question is when dh/dt = 0 (this is when the height is a maximum), is d^2h/dt^2 also zero... if we assume that then we get out h = 15m.

I tried to solve this another way using work energy...

[tex]\int_0^h{2k(v_{fluid} - v_{object})dy} = mgh + \frac{1}{2}mv_{object}^2[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^h{(\sqrt{400-20y} - v_{object})dy} = 10h + \frac{1}{2}v_{object}^2[/tex]

Then taking the derivative of both sides with respect to h...

[tex]\sqrt{400-20h} - v_{object} = 10 + v_{object} * \frac{dv_{object}}{dh}[/tex]

substitute that vobject is 0 (note that vobject is just dh/dt)... then you get:

[tex]\sqrt{400-20h} = 10[/tex], giving h = 15... so we see that when dh/dt = 0 h=15... and so substituting back into our previous equation we see that d^2h/dt^2 is also zero at this point...

The fact that d^2h/dt^2 is also zero at the same time that dh/dt is 0 really wasn't obvious to me... I'm thinking the object rises up reaches some maximum speed then slows down while still rising and then comes to rest at the top...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K