How high can Jill reach on the swing after Jack jumps off?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two circus performers, Jack and Jill, on a swing, where Jack steps off at the bottom of the swing. The question seeks to determine the maximum height Jill can reach after Jack jumps off, given their combined mass and the swing's length and initial angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy, questioning whether the system remains closed after Jack steps off. They explore the implications of Jack's departure on the swing's speed and energy dynamics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding the conservation of energy and the nature of the system. There are varying interpretations of the problem, and participants are sharing different answers, indicating an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion due to differing answers among participants, suggesting that assumptions about the system's behavior may be under scrutiny. The problem setup includes specific masses and angles that may influence the discussion.

Summer202
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hey everyone
I am so glad I found this forum
I just have this one question that I need help with:

two circus performers, Jack and Jill, whose total mass is 120 Kg, start a swing which is 5.0 m long such that initially the rope attatched to their swing makes an angle of 36 degrees with the horizontal. At the bottom of the arc, Jack, whose mass is 65 Kg, steps off. What is the maximum height of a landing ramp that Jill can reach as the swing continues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this is slightly tricky!

Usually you would use conservation of energy: the sum of kinetic and potential energy remains unchanged in a closed system. The problem is that since Jack steps off, the system isn't closed!

However, notice that Jack "steps" off, so he doesn't change the speed of the swing at the bottom.

I will pose two questions to you, and your answers to them ought to lead you to the answer to your question.

First: Would the swing have been going any faster at the bottom if Jack had never been on the swing at all?

Second: If no one jumps off, is there any difference between Jack and Jill being on the same swing versus separate swings side by side?
 
hm thankyou
I got the et=et prime
everyones getting different answers so its kinda of confusing
 
Ok, then I'll give you another hint.

A system is not closed if energy leaves or enters the system. In this case, no energy enters the system, but energy does leave.

At the bottom of the swing, there is only one form of energy: kinetic. This can be broken up into the kinetic energy Jack is contributing and the kinetic energy Jill is contributing. When Jack leaves the swing, all his kinetic energy goes with him (and dissipates into the ground, as he breaks his crown). This leaves only Jill's kinetic energy left.

However, note that the amount of kinetic energy Jill has at the bottom of the swing is exactly the same amount she would have had at the bottom of the swing if she had been swinging along all along. In other words, Jack's presence on the swing did not affect the amount of kinetic energy accumulated by Jill as gravity worked it magic.

This means that there IS a closed system we can consider, namely Jill swinging by herself. Since Jack's body never interacted with Jill's swinging in any way, the system consisting only of Jill's kinetic and potential energy IS closed.

This means that there is conservation of energy with respect to the system consisting of Jill. You can fill in the rest, I'm sure.
 
ok so basically
this is what I did

mgh=1/2mv^2

through that i calculated v and got an answer of 7.59 m/s

and then during the swing after jack leaves i calculated the kinetic energy
1/2mv^2=mgh where m=55 and the velocity stays the same

and i got 2.94 m

but then.. it seems wrong. LOL
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K