How high will UT bounce on a bungee jump from the Golden Gate Bridge?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

UT will bungee jump from a height of 65 meters off the Golden Gate Bridge, with the bungee rope pulling her up 8 meters above the water. Given UT's weight of 63 kg, the potential energy (PE) at the start is calculated as 35191 J. The velocity just before the fall is determined to be 33.45 m/s, leading to a calculated upward displacement of 55.4 meters. The discussion concludes that, assuming no energy loss, the energy from the fall is converted to elastic potential energy in the rope, allowing UT to return to her original height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PE = mgh)
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations (v^2 - u^2 = 2as)
  • Knowledge of elastic potential energy concepts
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in elastic systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of bungee jumping and the physics of elastic materials
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance and friction on bungee jumping dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the mechanics of bungee jumping and energy conservation principles.

Superman123
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. Ut will bungee jump from the golden gate bridge. The height that she will jump from is 65 meters. The rope pulls her up 8 meters above the water. If UT's weight is 63 kg, how far will the rubber rope pull her upwards, if there's no loss to friction or air resistance?

Homework Equations


PE= mgh
v=√2gh
v^2-u^2=2as

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I started by calculating the energy of the fall.
PE= 63*(65-8)*9.8= 35191 J

I then tried to calculate the velocity that she reaches when she is about to fall.
v=√2gh= 33.45 m/s

I then used v^2-u^2=2as, u^2 at the top is 0 and a= g=9.8 and s=h
v^2-u^2=2as
33.45^2-0= 2*9.82* s
s= 55.4 meters

That seems oddly wrong that she could reach such a height, is this the right way to do it or is there a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if literally no energy is lost?
 
Well, the energy produced will be enough to bounce her back where she started, if nothing of it is lost; though I don't know how to present it with formulas to show that my reasoning is enough
 
Superman123 said:
Well, the energy produced will be enough to bounce her back where she started, if nothing of it is lost; though I don't know how to present it with formulas to show that my reasoning is enough

I would say you don't need any formulas, but you perhaps need to describe the scenario in physics terms. After all, if you push a vehicle along a flat, frictionless track, it doesn't come back to where it started.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Superman123
Is saying " The energy of the fall will be preserved in the rope and because there's no energy loss, the rope will pull up UT with the same energy, getting here to the same she started in." correct, considering physics terms?
 
Superman123 said:
Is saying " The energy of the fall will be preserved in the rope and because there's no energy loss, the rope will pull up UT with the same energy, getting here to the same she started in." correct, considering physics terms?

Perhaps better is that the initial gravitational PE is converted to elastic PE in the rope, then back to gravitational PE again ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Superman123
Oh, thanks for your time and help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
34K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
31K