How Is Acceleration Calculated in a Space Shuttle Launch?

Click For Summary
Acceleration during a Space Shuttle launch is calculated using the formula F=ma, where the total force is the sum of the thrust from all engines. The shuttle has three main engines producing 1.7 MN each and two booster rockets producing 23 MN each, achieving maximum thrust after 0.5 seconds. The mass of the shuttle is approximately 2.0 x 10^6 kg. To find acceleration, the total force is divided by the mass, confirming that force is additive. Understanding these calculations is essential for analyzing the shuttle's launch dynamics.
confusedmia
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
[Here's the exact question!] A space shuttle is fully fueled and stand on a launching pad. At launch there are 5 separate engines pushing the shuttle skyward, 3 main engines of 1.7MN thrust each, plus 2 booster rockets each producing 23MN of thrust. Max thrust T is achieved after 0.5sec. Calculate the acceleration of the shuttle 0.5sec after ignition, taking the mass of the shuttle to be 2.0^10(to the power of)6 kg at this instance.
Relevant Equations
Fnet=ma, w=mg
Sorry there, relatively new to this topic. Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration. So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2), while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably all they mean is that the rockets take 0.5s to get up to maximum thrust.
 
  • Like
Likes confusedmia
confusedmia said:
Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration.
Yes.
So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2)
Yes, force is additive. If you have multiple forces, the effect of them all put together is the [vector] sum of the individual forces. F=ma is often written as ##\Sigma F=ma## to reflect this.

However, there is a force that you have not accounted for.
while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
The kilogram is already a unit of mass.
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
Yes

Note that one would normally write two million as 2.0E+6, as 2.0x106, 2.0x10^6 or even ##2.0\times 10^6##
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
confusedmia said:
Problem Statement: [Here's the exact question!] A space shuttle is fully fueled and stand on a launching pad. At launch there are 5 separate engines pushing the shuttle skyward, 3 main engines of 1.7MN thrust each, plus 2 booster rockets each producing 23MN of thrust. Max thrust T is achieved after 0.5sec. Calculate the acceleration of the shuttle 0.5sec after ignition, taking the mass of the shuttle to be 2.0^10(to the power of)6 kg at this instance.
Relevant Equations: Fnet=ma, w=mg

Sorry there, relatively new to this topic. Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration. So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2), while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
Physicists at the time defined Newton as a unit based on Newton's second law, which defined the force required to accelerate a kilogram of material at one meter per second as 1N
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
798
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K