How Is Acceleration Calculated in Rotational Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vladimir_Kitanov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Rotation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of acceleration in the context of rotational motion, specifically focusing on angular acceleration and its relationship to tangential and normal acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between angular acceleration and its units, questioning the validity of certain derivations and the application of formulas. There is also a focus on differentiating angular velocity with respect to time versus angle.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, raising questions about unit consistency and the appropriateness of certain formulas. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of derivatives in the context of rotational motion.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the terminology used, particularly the term "linear" acceleration, and how it relates to the magnitude of acceleration in this problem. Participants are also addressing potential mistakes in calculations and assumptions made in the original post.

Vladimir_Kitanov
Messages
44
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
On picture
Relevant Equations
##\theta = \theta_0 + \omega _0 t + \frac {1}{2} \alpha t^2##
##\omega = \omega_0 + \alpha t##
##\omega^2 = \omega_0^2 + 2 \alpha (\theta - \theta_0)##
##a_t = \alpha * r##
##a_n = \omega^2 * r##
Capture.png

Answer should be (c) 32,7 ##\frac{m}{s^2}##

My attempt:

##\omega_{2\pi}## -> ##\omega## after 1 revolution
##\omega_{2\pi} = 0,2 * (2\pi)^2##
##\omega_{2\pi} = 7,9 \frac{rad}{s}##

##\frac {d}{dt}\omega = \alpha = 0,2*2*\theta##
##\alpha_{2\pi}## -> ##\alpha## after 1 revolution
##\alpha_{2\pi} = 2,51 \frac {rad}{s}##

##a_n## -> normal acceleration
##a_t## -> tangential acceleration

##a_t = \alpha_{2\pi} * r = 1,26 \frac {m}{s^2}##
##a_n = \omega^2 * r = 32,205 \frac {m}{s^2}##
##a = \sqrt{a_n^2 + a_t^2} = 31,2 \frac{m}{s^2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vladimir_Kitanov said:
##\frac {d}{dt}\omega = \alpha = 0,2*2*\theta##
##\alpha_{2\pi}## -> ##\alpha## after 1 revolution
##\alpha_{2\pi} = 2,51 \frac {rad}{s}##
Does ##\alpha## have the proper units of angular acceleration in your derivation?
 
Vladimir_Kitanov said:
##\frac {d}{dt}\omega = \alpha = 0,2*2*\theta##
I am concerned with:
##\frac {d}{dt}\omega = \alpha = 0,2*2*\theta##

You are given ##\omega## as a function of ##\theta##. But you appear to have differentiated with respect to ##\theta## and obtained a derivative with respect to ##t##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vladimir_Kitanov and malawi_glenn
This might be easier to think about the differentiation
## \omega = 0.2 \cdot (\theta(t))^2##

Note, some of the formulas you listed as "relevant" does not apply here. Why is it so?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
malawi_glenn said:
Note, some of the formulas you listed as "relevant" does not apply here. Why is it so?
I just put them there.
They are useful in some problems like that.
 
erobz said:
Does ##\alpha## have the proper units of angular acceleration in your derivation?
No ##\alpha## have unit ##\frac{rad}{s^2}##
But that does not change anything.
 
jbriggs444 said:
I am concerned with:
##\frac {d}{dt}\omega = \alpha = 0,2*2*\theta##

You are given ##\omega## as a function of ##\theta##. But you appear to have differentiated with respect to ##\theta## and obtained a derivative with respect to ##t##.
That is my mistake.
Thanks.

It should be:
##\alpha = 0,2*2*\theta*\omega##
Derivative of ##\theta## with respect to time is ##\omega##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2, erobz, jbriggs444 and 1 other person
Vladimir_Kitanov said:
No ##\alpha## have unit ##\frac{rad}{s^2}##
But that does not change anything.
But it does.

For future reference: If you derive something, and its units do not match the quantity you are after then there is a mistake in said derivation.
 
To summarize, $$\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}=\frac{d\omega}{d\theta}\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\omega \frac{d\omega}{d\theta}.$$What is the tangential component ##a_t##?
 
  • #10
kuruman said:
$$\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}=\frac{d\omega}{d\theta}\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\omega \frac{d\omega}{d\theta}.$$What is the tangential component ##a_t##?
##a_t = \alpha * r##
##\alpha## is angular acceleration.
Capture.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #11
The term “linear” acceleration is confusing in the problem statement. What I think is being calculated is just the magnitude of the acceleration?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #12
erobz said:
The term “linear” acceleration is confusing in the problem statement. What I think is being calculated is just the magnitude of the acceleration?
Yes
 
  • #13
Vladimir_Kitanov said:
Yes
You got the basic concept correct in your OP but just are having issues with the numerical calculations. It is the vector sum as you tried to compute originally. You just need to be very careful computing ##a_n## and ##a_t## especially the part explained by @kuruman in post #9.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, Delta2, Steve4Physics and 1 other person
  • #14
Vladimir_Kitanov said:
##a_t = \alpha_{2\pi} * r = 1,26 \frac {m}{s^2}##
##a_n = \omega^2 * r = 32,205 \frac {m}{s^2}##
##a = \sqrt{a_n^2 + a_t^2} = 31,2 \frac{m}{s^2}##
In addition to the other comments, can I add that the hypotenuse is the longest side of a right-triangle.

(Minor edit.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
910
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K