How Is Impulse Calculated for a Rocket with Changing Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alameen Damer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Mass
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the impulse for a rocket with a changing mass due to the consumption of propellant. The rocket starts at rest and reaches a final speed after burning the propellant, raising questions about how to account for the changing mass in the impulse calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to calculate impulse given the changing mass of the rocket as propellant is used. There is uncertainty about whether to include the mass of the propellant in the impulse calculation and whether the question seeks total impulse or effective impulse on the rocket. Some participants suggest that the distinction between the rocket and the fuel is important for the calculation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions behind the impulse calculation, particularly regarding the treatment of the propellant's mass. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the question, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity in the problem statement regarding whether the impulse should consider the propellant's mass and how the changing mass affects the calculation. Participants note that the question may have more parts that could influence the interpretation.

Alameen Damer
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1990 kg rocket is loaded with 102 kg of propellant. It exhausts the propellant in a burn of 25s. The rocket starts at rest, and moves with a speed of 240 m/s after the burn. Determine the impulse.

Homework Equations


Impulse (p) = m1vf-m1vi

The Attempt at a Solution


How would one calculate the impulse given that the mass changes because of the loaded propellant which is used up by the time the mass hits the final velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alameen Damer said:

Homework Statement


A 1990 kg rocket is loaded with 102 kg of propellant. It exhausts the propellant in a burn of 25s. The rocket starts at rest, and moves with a speed of 240 m/s after the burn. Determine the impulse.

Homework Equations


Impulse (p) = m1vf-m1vi

The Attempt at a Solution


How would one calculate the impulse given that the mass changes because of the loaded propellant which is used up by the time the mass hits the final velocity.
The question seems ambiguous. Is it the total impulse generated by the fuel that's wanted, or the effective impulse on the rocket? The second is quite easy.
 
I would assume the effective impulse on the rocket, given that they talk about it speeding up, etc. If this is the case, using (p) = m1vf-m1vi, do I include the 102 kg propellant as part of the mass?
 
Alameen Damer said:
I would assume the effective impulse on the rocket, given that they talk about it speeding up, etc. If this is the case, using (p) = m1vf-m1vi, do I include the 102 kg propellant as part of the mass?
The description speaks of rocket and fuel as distinct, so no, it would not include the 102kg. That's what makes the question easy. If yiu had to include the 102kg you would not know what to put for final velocity. Relative to the ground, fuel expelled early would have a different velocity from that expelled later.
 
The basic rule is that force equals the derivative of momentum. If the mass is constant, that is "mass times the acceleration" but if mass is not constant, it is (mv)'= m'v+ mv'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
The basic rule is that force equals the derivative of momentum. If the mass is constant, that is "mass times the acceleration" but if mass is not constant, it is (mv)'= m'v+ mv'.
Halls, I'm not alone in regarding that formulation as misleading. It treats mass as an arbitrary variable, as though a moving object can acquire mass out of nowhere. In reality, the mass must come from or go to somewhere else. For the equation to work, that mass must not bring in or take out any momentum, i.e. when not part of the object it must be at rest in the reference frame. I wrote a homily on this in section 6 of https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/frequently-made-errors-mechanics-momentum-impacts/.

Anyway, if I'm reading the question correctly, there is no need to get tangled up with that. The information regarding the mass of fuel is redundant. (But maybe there are more parts to the question.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K