How Is Lambda Max Derived from Planck's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter georgeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivation of Lambda_max from Planck's Law is established through the energy density formula for radiation, given by S_{\lambda} = (8πhc/λ^5) * (1/(e^{hc/λkT} - 1)). To find the maximum wavelength, the derivative dS/dλ is set to zero, leading to the equation that must be solved numerically for λ_maxT. The constant term 8πhc is irrelevant for determining the peak position, simplifying the process. An analytical solution is not available, necessitating numerical methods for resolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law and its implications in thermal radiation.
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically derivatives and optimization techniques.
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for solving equations without analytical solutions.
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics, particularly the relationship between temperature and wavelength.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn numerical methods for solving equations, focusing on root-finding algorithms.
  • Study the derivation and implications of Planck's Law in detail.
  • Explore advanced calculus techniques for optimization problems.
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature and wavelength in blackbody radiation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying thermodynamics and quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in the applications of Planck's Law and numerical analysis in deriving physical constants.

georgeh
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that states
Show that the wavelength Lamba_max=(2892 micro meters*K)/T
hint: set the dS/DLamba=0.
i have no idea how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the maximum of a function. The maximum of a function is given when f'(x) = 0. So taking Planck's radiation formula for energy density per unit wavelength;

[tex]S_{\lambda} = \frac{8\pi hc}{\lambda^{5}} \cdot \frac{1}{e^{\frac{hc}{\lambda kT}} - 1}[/tex]

The constant term [itex]8\pi hc[/itex] does not effect the position of the peak and can therefore be ignored. Thus the derivative becomes;

[tex]\frac{d}{d\lambda} = \frac{1}{\lambda^5}\cdot \frac{1}{e^{\frac{hc}{\lambda kT}} - 1} \;\; d\lambda = 0[/tex]

Once you have found the derivative all that remains is to solve the equation. As far as I know there exists no analytical solution to the equation and it must be solved numerically. However, if I have time I may venture into the maths forums and inquire as to whether an analytical solution exists.

HINT: Solve numerically for [itex]\lambda_{max}T[/itex] first.

~H
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K