How is my text book getting the components of a vector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the x and y components of a vector B, which is positioned at 130° from the positive x-axis with a magnitude of 5. The textbook method utilizes the cosine and sine functions directly, calculating the components as 5(cos130°) and 5(sin130°), rather than relying on the SOH CAH TOA mnemonic. This approach is identified as a rotation matrix technique, which allows for the determination of vector components without constructing a right triangle. The conversation also touches on the use of double-angle formulas to validate the equivalence of both methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Familiarity with vector components and their calculations
  • Knowledge of rotation matrices in linear algebra
  • Basic comprehension of double-angle formulas in trigonometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of rotation matrices in vector transformations
  • Learn about double-angle formulas and their use in trigonometric identities
  • Explore advanced trigonometric methods for vector component analysis
  • Practice calculating vector components using various angles and magnitudes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or mathematics, educators teaching vector analysis, and anyone interested in advanced trigonometric techniques for vector decomposition.

student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


My textbook shows a vector B 130° from the positive x-axis. B has a value of 5; it asks for the x and y components for B.

But they show a way other than SOH CAH TOA. They got the x component by multiplying 5(cos130°) and the y component by multiplying 5(sin130°). What is this method?


Homework Equations


All I know is SOH CAH TOA, but that obviously will not work in this case.


The Attempt at a Solution


I can easily figure it out by putting B into a right triangle to get the x and y components. But I am interested in learning this technique too which I apparently missed some where along the way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the usual method. sin and cos are defined for angles greater than 90, they can also be reduced
5(cos130°)=-5(cos50°)
5(sin130°)=5(sin50°)
 
(@student34)
I'm guessing the way you did it was to consider the triangle between the line and the y-axis (or x axis), then relate this to the x and y components with respect to the origin? This way is fine, but yeah, their way is faster.

Do you know how to use double-angle formula? You can use this to show why their method and your method both give the same result. hint: 130=90+40 and use this in the double-angle formula.

Fundamentally, their method is using a rotation matrix to rotate the line counter-clockwise. are you familiar with rotation matrix? You can sort of justify their method by drawing a couple of different positions of the line, and seeing how the angle changes and how that changes the x and y components. (try this out, I think it helps give a feel for what is going on)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K