Classical How is the book "Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics"?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the book "Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics" by Jack Wisdom and Gerald Jay Sussman, which is noted for its connection between physics and computer programming. Participants express curiosity about the book's value for learning classical mechanics, particularly for those with a background in physics. While the book is published by MIT Press and is considered well-reviewed, opinions vary on its accessibility, especially due to its focus on numerical computations and non-standard notations. Some participants highlight the importance of considering the author's background in computer science when evaluating the book's approach to physics. The text is available online, which adds to its appeal for those interested in exploring it further. Overall, there is a sense of cautious optimism about the book's potential as a resource, despite its specialized focus.
CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34
I learned some computer science basics from the book SICP ( Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Authors: Gerald Jay Sussman, Hal Abelson, Julie Sussman ) and I've witnessed a book about mechanics from the same author called Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, authors: Jack Wisdom, Gerald Jay Sussman.
How is it as a book that teaches classical mechanics ( I have experience in physics but that was long time ago )? is it worthwhile investing the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can only assume that you looked it up on Amazon. Just because a book is not famous (talked about here or on StackExchange) doesn't mean it can't be a gem waiting to be found. This is under MIT Press and I'm pretty sure it was well reviewed by the corpus of the prestigious school. The price is high, maybe a used copy somewhere can be made available for at least 1/2 a price.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
The book seems to be adjusted to those who are interested in numerical computations. Not my cup of tea.
 
I like how the book seems to relate physics to computer programs/numerical computations. The only downside is that some of the notations in the book are non-standard but that shouldn't be a problem. I think I'll order a copy once I'll have time to immerse myself into it. Thanks!
 
Gerry Sussman is a professor of computer science, so what you say is not surprising. In general, I would consider physics texts written by non-physicists at best as intended for a narrow and specialized audience.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
15K
Back
Top