How is the book "Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics"?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the book "Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics" by Jack Wisdom and Gerald Jay Sussman, particularly its value as a resource for learning classical mechanics. Participants share their experiences and opinions regarding its content, focus, and teaching style.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses curiosity about the book's effectiveness for learning classical mechanics, noting their previous experience in physics.
  • Another participant suggests that the book may be underappreciated despite not being widely discussed, indicating it could still be valuable.
  • A participant mentions that the book appears to be tailored for those interested in numerical computations, which they do not find appealing.
  • Another participant appreciates the connection between physics and computer programming/numerical computations, although they note some non-standard notations in the book.
  • A participant raises a concern about the authors' backgrounds, suggesting that physics texts by non-physicists might cater to a specialized audience.
  • One participant shares a link to the book's online availability, indicating it aligns with their interests, while also acknowledging the computational focus of the text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about the book, with some appreciating its unique approach and others questioning its suitability for a broader audience. There is no consensus on its overall value or effectiveness as a learning tool.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the book's focus on numerical computations and non-standard notations, which may limit its accessibility or appeal to certain readers. The discussion reflects varying perspectives on the authors' qualifications and the book's intended audience.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of physics and computer science, particularly those exploring numerical methods in classical mechanics, may find this discussion relevant.

CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34
I learned some computer science basics from the book SICP ( Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Authors: Gerald Jay Sussman, Hal Abelson, Julie Sussman ) and I've witnessed a book about mechanics from the same author called Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, authors: Jack Wisdom, Gerald Jay Sussman.
How is it as a book that teaches classical mechanics ( I have experience in physics but that was long time ago )? is it worthwhile investing the time?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
I can only assume that you looked it up on Amazon. Just because a book is not famous (talked about here or on StackExchange) doesn't mean it can't be a gem waiting to be found. This is under MIT Press and I'm pretty sure it was well reviewed by the corpus of the prestigious school. The price is high, maybe a used copy somewhere can be made available for at least 1/2 a price.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
The book seems to be adjusted to those who are interested in numerical computations. Not my cup of tea.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
I like how the book seems to relate physics to computer programs/numerical computations. The only downside is that some of the notations in the book are non-standard but that shouldn't be a problem. I think I'll order a copy once I'll have time to immerse myself into it. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Gerry Sussman is a professor of computer science, so what you say is not surprising. In general, I would consider physics texts written by non-physicists at best as intended for a narrow and specialized audience.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K