How Is the Electric Field Difference Across a Charged Surface Determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madafo3435
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field difference across a charged surface is determined using Gauss's law, specifically through the application of a Gaussian pillbox. For a surface with charge density σ, the electric field difference on either side of the surface is given by the equation E_{n,1} - E_{n,2} = σ / ε₀. This relationship holds true regardless of the surface shape, as the electric field is orthogonal to the surface, leading to zero flux through the sides of the pillbox as its size approaches zero. The discussion clarifies the general case presented by Purcell, reinforcing the fundamental principles of electrostatics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and notation
  • Knowledge of charge density and its implications
  • Basic grasp of Gaussian surfaces and flux calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the applications of Gaussian surfaces in different geometries
  • Explore the relationship between electric field and charge density in various contexts
  • Investigate the implications of electric field discontinuities across surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and professionals in electrical engineering seeking a deeper understanding of electric fields and charge distributions.

madafo3435
Messages
55
Reaction score
15
Homework Statement
I am studying the book Electricity and Magnetism by Edward M. Purcell. I resort to the forum because I have problems in understanding where the equation (1.45) that I indicate at the end of my attached images comes from.
Relevant Equations
.
f0.png
f1.png
I understand that this difference is valid for E = 0 and E2 = σ / Ɛ0, but Purcell covers a more general case, and I don't see how this difference is fulfilled in other cases.

I appreciate the help you can give me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a surface of some charge density, and of any general shape. At some point on the surface, construct a very tiny Gaussian pillbox that passes through the surface. At all points on the surface the field due to the surface is orthogonal to the surface, so the flux through the sides of the pillbox approaches zero as we make the pillbox smaller. The net flux out of the pillbox, if the electric fields on either side are ##\vec{E}_1## and ##\vec{E}_2##, will be$$\Phi = \vec{E}_2 \cdot \hat{n} \delta S + \vec{E}_1 \cdot (-\hat{n}) \delta S = (\vec{E}_2 - \vec{E}_1) \cdot \hat{n} \delta S = (E_{n,1} - E_{n,2}) \delta S = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0} \implies E_{n,1} - E_{n,2} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}$$since the unit outward normals, ##\hat{n}## and ##-\hat{n}##, to the two opposite faces of the pillbox will be oppositely directed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: madafo3435
etotheipi said:
Take a surface of some charge density, and of any general shape. At some point on the surface, construct a very tiny Gaussian pillbox that passes through the surface. At all points on the surface the field due to the surface is orthogonal to the surface, so the flux through the sides of the pillbox approaches zero as we make the pillbox smaller. The net flux out of the surface, if the electric fields on either side are ##\vec{E}_1## and ##\vec{E}_2##, will be$$\Phi = \vec{E}_2 \cdot \hat{n} \delta S + \vec{E}_1 \cdot (-\hat{n}) \delta S = (\vec{E}_2 - \vec{E}_1) \cdot \hat{n} \delta S = (E_{n,1} - E_{n,2}) \delta S = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0} \implies E_{n,1} - E_{n,2} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}$$since the unit outward normals, ##\hat{n}## and ##-\hat{n}##, to the two opposite faces of the pillbox will be oppositely directed.
His explanation was very clear, now I understand. Thank you very much
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K