How is the Inverse Phasor Transform of Sum of Individual Phasors Proven?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inverse Phasor transform of the sum of individual Phasors of sinusoidal functions of the same frequency is proven to be the sum of the sinusoids. This is established through the use of trigonometric identities and complex exponentials, demonstrating that the sum of the complex exponentials corresponds to the sum of the sinusoidal functions. The equations provided illustrate how to derive the resultant amplitude and phase angle from the individual components, confirming the relationship between the two forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Phasor representation in sinusoidal functions
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and Euler's formula
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications
  • Basic principles of Laplace transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inverse Phasor transform in detail
  • Learn about the application of Laplace transforms in signal processing
  • Explore the relationship between complex exponentials and trigonometric functions
  • Investigate the use of Phasors in electrical engineering and control systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, signal processing, and applied mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of Phasor analysis and its applications in sinusoidal functions.

seminum
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Can someone show me how the inverse Phasor transform of the sum of individual Phasors of sinusoidal functions of the same frequency is the sum of the sinusoids? I could not find any rigorous proof and help appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Somehow I have a feeling the proof is in the Laplace transform...I will keep looking
 
Can you start by writing out an equation for what you say in words in Post #1?
 
Here are the equations:

<br /> \sigma = A_{0}\cos(wt + \phi_{0}) + A_{1}\cos(wt + \phi_{1}) + ... + A_{n}\cos(wt + \phi_{n}) = \mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi_{0})<br />
<br /> \sigma = \mathbf{Re}\{A_{0}e^{\phi_{0}i}e^{wti}\} + \mathbf{Re}\{A_{1}e^{\phi_{1}i}e^{wti}\} + ... + \mathbf{Re}\{A_{n}e^{\phi_{n}i}e^{wti}\}<br />
<br /> \sigma = \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{0}e^{wti}\} + \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{1}e^{wti}\} + ... + \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{n}e^{wti}\}<br />

My question why...?

<br /> \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n} \mathbf{P}_{i} = \mathbf{P}\{\mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi)\}<br />

Thanks.
 
What do you mean by ##\mathbf{P}\{\mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi)\}##? Does this equal ##\mathbf{B}\exp(i\Phi)##?

Also, is it significant that you used boldface for ##\mathbf{B}##? Isn't it just some real number? I want to make sure I understand what you are asking.
 
Yes. It's just the Phasor transform.

Yes, B is a real number.
 
OK,
$$\begin{align}
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\cos(\omega t + \phi_k) &= \sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k[\cos(\omega t)\cos(\phi_k) - \sin(\omega t)\sin(\phi_k)] \\
&= \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \cos(\phi_k)\right) \cos(\omega t) - \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)\right)\sin(\omega t) \\
&= A\cos(\omega t + \Phi) \\
\end{align}$$
To compute ##A## and ##\Phi##, we again use the trig identity
$$A\cos(\omega t + \Phi) = A\cos(\Phi)\cos(\omega t) - A\sin(\Phi)\sin(\omega t)$$
and compare with what we have above to conclude that
$$A \cos(\Phi) = \sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \cos(\phi_k)$$
and
$$A\sin(\Phi) = \sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)$$
Therefore,
$$\begin{align}
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \exp(i\phi_k) &=
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k) + i\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)\\
&= A[\cos(\Phi) + i\sin(\Phi)] = A\exp(i \Phi)
\end{align}$$
which gives us what we want.

If desired, we can calculate ##A## and ##\Phi## explicitly as follows:
$$A = \sqrt{\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k)\right)^2 + \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \sin(\phi_k)\right)^2}$$
and
$$\Phi = \arctan\left(\frac{\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \sin(\phi_k)}{\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k)}\right)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
seminum said:
Can someone show me how the inverse Phasor transform of the sum of individual Phasors of sinusoidal functions of the same frequency is the sum of the sinusoids?

jbunniii has a nice and very thorough demonstration above.

One of the interesting things you notice is the close relationship between addition of complex exponentials and angle addition in the trig identities. If you keep it in complex exponential form, then you can also show what you say (in words) above by:
$$
\begin{align}
\mathcal{P}^{-1} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} \mathbf{P}_j \Biggr\}
&= \mathcal{P}^{-1} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{\phi_{j}i} \Biggr\} \\
&= \mathbf{Re} \Biggl\{ \Biggl[ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{\phi_{j}i} \Biggr] e^{wti} \Biggr\} \\
&= \mathbf{Re} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{(wt+\phi_{j})i} \Biggr\} \\
&= \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}\cos(wt+\phi_{j}) .
\end{align}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K