How Is the Particle Horizon Distance Calculated in a Universe with Dark Energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the particle horizon distance in a universe characterized by dark energy, specifically using parameters such as \(\Omega_M = 0.25\) and \(\omega = -1\). The original poster seeks to numerically integrate to find this distance, referencing the scaled Hubble constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a formula for horizon distance but questions its relevance to the given parameters. Some participants suggest reviewing the Friedmann equations to derive the scale factor \(a(t)\) correctly, while others inquire about the first Friedmann equation and its implications for the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on deriving equations and clarifying concepts. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of the Friedmann equations in the context of dark energy and matter density parameters. Multiple interpretations of the equations and their implications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to consider the correct conditions for a flat universe and the implications of non-zero matter density. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the derived equations and their correctness.

June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Numerically integrate and report the particle horizon distance today for the currently fa-
vored model \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25,\omega=-1. Assume the scaled Hubble constant to be h = 0.72, and report the particle horizon in billions of lyr (Gyr).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Horizen distance d=\int_0^{t0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}, so in a flat universe a(t)=(t/t0)^{2/(3(1+3\omega))},
so that we have $$d=\frac{2}{1+3\omega}H_0^{-1}$$,but this has nothing to do with \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
 
phyzguy said:
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
Oh that's right! So how do I derive a(t) from Friedmann equations?
 
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
 
phyzguy said:
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
Thank you! So that would be \frac{H^2}{H_0^2}=\frac{0.25}{a^3}+0.75,if we combine this with H=\frac{\dot{a}}{a} and I solved this equation (online), it gave me http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP226920fg7hgi3c9658be000033830f2a7886e3e4?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=20&w=550.&h=47. ? (a(x) means a(t) here). I think this isn't right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K