I How is the sound horizon at recombination and BAO measured in the CMB?

AI Thread Summary
The sound horizon at recombination, denoted as ~r(z*), is measured using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) at a redshift of z*=1100, with a theoretical basis for choosing an angular size of 1 degree. The physical size of the sound horizon at recombination is approximately 140 Mpc, which is calculated by relating the physical size to the proper distance from the observer to the CMB. This angular size remains constant as the universe expands, allowing for comparisons between observed temperature fluctuations in the CMB and theoretical predictions. The measurement process likely involves statistical analysis across the entire sky to account for the complexity of the data. Understanding these measurements is crucial for insights into the universe's geometry and expansion.
jordy1113
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
So I'm trying to understand the sound horizon measured at recombination and the sound horizon measured with BAO. Here is what I've gathered (PLEASE tell me if I'm wrong and if you could please explain, I've been trying to read but can't find a clear explanation):

~r(z*) is measured using CMB (could someone explain to me exactly how this is measured) at z*=1100 (recombination epoch)
~ r using BAO can be measured from the drag epoch to very very small redshifts
~ both sound horizons are basically the same (around 140Mpc, yes I know they're not exactly the same but they vary only a little)

Again if someone could explain how these are measure (like why choose angular size of 1 degree for r(z*)) I really need to clear up my confusion :( Thank you to everyone in advance
 
Space news on Phys.org
The experts seem to have vacated the premises, so you're stuck with me. My understanding is incomplete, though.

With that disclaimer - You get 1 degree as your base scale from theoretical considerations. You calculate the physical size of the sound horizon at recombination (r, about 0.14 Mpc, or 0.45 Mly, which is 150 Mpc in comoving terms). This gives you an idea of how big the largest 'bubble' leaving imprint on the CMB should be. You then calculate the proper distance from the observer to the CMB at recombination (R, about 45 Mly), so that you can relate the physical size to its observed size. Using small angle approximation, you get the angular size by dividing r/R, which netts about 1 degree. As the universe expands, this angular size remains constant.

You can then measure the size of the temperature fluctuations in the CMB to see how they compare to theory. E.g. a deviation here would suggest the geometry of the universe being different than the assumed flat one.

I have no hands-on experience with actually measuring these, nor have I seen it done.
I suspect it's done with some sort of statistical analysis across the whole sky, rather than taking a ruler to any single fluctuation, considering how messy it all is.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top